« Back to RenewAmerica

Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Wide-open discussion

Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby specter » January 5th, 2010, 12:51 pm

In the middle of America, you wouldn’t expect it to be so difficult to get a concealed carry permit. But in Iowa, it is — especially if the local sheriff doesn’t like you.

That’s why I’m glad to introduce you to a great new organization fighting on this issue. Iowa Gun Owners has been pushing for a major reform of Iowa’s “Might Issue” concealed carry laws.

Not since Alaska (in 2003) has a state passed a no-permit-needed concealed carry law, enacting real carry freedom for law-abiding gun owners.

Iowa Gun Owners burst on to the scene in their rural state because for too long nothing had been done about their atrocious gun laws.

Compared to most of the smaller states, Iowa has some of the worst firearms laws in America, and no one in power seemed to care (though local gun owners have wanted change for years).

But in early 2009, State Rep. Kent Sorenson (R-Indianola) sponsored a bill to end the demand that Iowans beg permission to carry concealed.

And Iowa Gun Owners took action.

Surprising pundits throughout the state, Iowa Gun Owners brought Sorensen’s bill within 1 vote of passing their State House.

Now, in an effort to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, the institutional gun lobby has offered a “compromise.” To many, that comes as no surprise, but it will spell defeat for any real concealed carry reform in Iowa.

Why would I write every gun owner in America for help on this issue?

First, Iowa is truly a pivotal state. Its early Straw Poll and Caucuses make it our nation’s most watched political barometer.

Second, rarely does the chance come to pass historic legislation like this.

Every freedom lover in America should be excited about the possibility.

It’s not just about one more “Shall Issue” state, but rather it’s about Iowa becoming a bellwether for liberty in the very heart of our nation.

I often hear “the Second Amendment is my permit to carry”, and I couldn’t agree more. What, after all, is the right to “bear arms”, in a modern context, if it is not to carry concealed?

But those are just empty words if the law makes a mockery of the Constitution.

With that in mind, I encourage everyone who truly embraces the Second Amendment’s right to “bear arms” without infringement to jump on board and help out Iowa Gun Owners.

Seriously, it’s that important.

To carry the tools of self-defense in Vermont and Alaska, you don’t have to undergo a background enema, be fingerprinted like a common criminal, pay for state-mandated firearms training or have your name and address end up on some list.

You don’t have to beg for your God-given rights. That’s what the Second Amendment REALLY means!

Unfortunately, some of the elitist gun owners in America — the head-honchos of the institutional gun lobby — have trouble understanding that. In many states, they even directly oppose Vermont-Alaska real concealed carry.

Their opposition to freedom is nothing but a self-serving “I’ve got mine” attitude, seasoned with a dash of “not EVERYONE should be able to carry a gun.”

But let’s examine that attitude: it means they don’t really oppose gun control.

They just oppose gun control when it’s imposed on them. Give them their own little tin-pot dictatorship, and they’re happy to limit your freedom.

Understand that real concealed carry doesn’t allow a criminal to carry concealed legally, since that criminal is already ineligible to possess a firearm in the first place. Enacting a Vermont-Alaska law simply affirms a God-given right, which is secured by the U.S. Constitution and all but 6 state constitutions.

While it’s true that permitless carry does not provide a mechanism to carry across friendly state lines, it does remove the hoops-and-hurdles in the home state. If one is worried about reciprocity acquiring a permit will still be an option.


Source
Image
Image
User avatar
specter
 
Posts: 4872
Joined: November 12th, 2005, 3:46 pm
Location: A better place, a better time

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby halley » January 5th, 2010, 1:37 pm

Only cowards have guns and use them. All guns in American should be destroyed. And all weapons or war will when Jesus returns. :pray: My self defense in my GOD. Man with his guns can destroy my body but not my soul. :pray: :clap: :victory:
With GOD by my side, whom do I fear? :)
halley
 
Posts: 7056
Joined: November 27th, 2006, 7:01 pm
Location: Reno, NV

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby davehines » January 5th, 2010, 10:10 pm

halley wrote:Only cowards have guns and use them.


Calling our soldiers and police officers cowards? Nice! :twisted:
"When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things bought and sold are legislators."
-- P. J. O'Rourke
davehines
 
Posts: 6833
Joined: August 17th, 2007, 3:08 am

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby halley » January 6th, 2010, 1:52 am

davehines wrote:
halley wrote:Only cowards have guns and use them.


Calling our soldiers and police officers cowards? Nice! :twisted:


Do I have to name all the exceptions? Condesending fool. Your post was not about soldiers and police officers and I was responding in such.
If the Las Vegas shooter did not have a gun he could not have shot up the court house.
halley
 
Posts: 7056
Joined: November 27th, 2006, 7:01 pm
Location: Reno, NV

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby davehines » January 6th, 2010, 5:10 am

halley wrote:
davehines wrote:
halley wrote:Only cowards have guns and use them.


Calling our soldiers and police officers cowards? Nice! :twisted:


Do I have to name all the exceptions? Condesending fool. Your post was not about soldiers and police officers and I was responding in such.
If the Las Vegas shooter did not have a gun he could not have shot up the court house.


First, it wasn't my post to which you responded. Second, you said "only"; the wording is designed to admit no exceptions.

Thirdly, if some of the soldiers at Ft. Hood had guns the captain wouldn't have taken down so many casualties. Particulars can work the other way, too. One example is not a universal principle.
"When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things bought and sold are legislators."
-- P. J. O'Rourke
davehines
 
Posts: 6833
Joined: August 17th, 2007, 3:08 am

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby kerwin » January 6th, 2010, 7:38 am

halley wrote:Only cowards have guns and use them. All guns in American should be destroyed. And all weapons or war will when Jesus returns. :pray: My self defense in my GOD. Man with his guns can destroy my body but not my soul. :pray: :clap: :victory:
With GOD by my side, whom do I fear? :)


Why did Jesus instruct his disciples to carry swords in their travels?
Kerwin

To continue the fight to insure the blessing of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ourselves and our children yet unborn is the mark of a true American Patriot.
kerwin
 
Posts: 11855
Joined: January 1st, 2006, 3:01 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Iowans "TAKE TO THEIR GUNS"

Postby specter » January 6th, 2010, 9:17 am

kerwin wrote:
halley wrote:Only cowards have guns and use them. All guns in American should be destroyed. And all weapons or war will when Jesus returns. :pray: My self defense in my GOD. Man with his guns can destroy my body but not my soul. :pray: :clap: :victory:
With GOD by my side, whom do I fear? :)


Why did Jesus instruct his disciples to carry swords in their travels?


Good point.

Because the BIBLICAL "Jesus" isn't the person most "Christians" think He is. He was NOT a pacifist.
Image
Image
User avatar
specter
 
Posts: 4872
Joined: November 12th, 2005, 3:46 pm
Location: A better place, a better time


Return to Open Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest