Hope Carrots, Engines, & the Real Easter Egg Hunt
http://www.newpath4.com/ariannaandthene ... udeoil.gif .
I haven't ignored anything Christian. If you take a look at Bruce Lee
or Jean-Claude Van Damme practicing their moves, you would
know more about where my moves are coming from.
They aren't coming from trickery. I've discovered
the ebb and the flow, left to right, the Push & the Pull.
I'm not that hard to figure out, nor the way I think things through.
It has resulted in engines and systems that compliment each other.
Even my anti-gravity engine. Same thing. Several engines filling one slot, one need.
All engines usually have a "sweet spot" where it realizes Maximum Engine Output.
To achieve that sweet spot an engine will also contain other spots that are
not so sweet, spots of inefficiency. I did a pretty good job explaining it on this page:
http://www.newpath4.com/perpetualmotionpix.htm#Perpetual_Motion_direct_result_of_
Perfect_Timing_Impossible_to_Achieve_before_Computers_but_not_NOW .
Basically, you pair engines together that bounce or skip through each other's sweet spots, taking
full advantage of the best each has to offer. And, in essence, forming
an extremely EFFICIENT NEW Multi-ENGINE. That's perhaps why
some people are having difficulty understanding my conclusions,
because you first almost need to understand my method
of combining engine sweet spots first.
All my engine explanations are pretty much summed up in 3 webpages, including links on those pages:
http://www.newpath4.com/drivingfromnewyorktohollywood_thecarsizesteamengine.htm
http://www.newpath4.com/enginewow.htm
http://www.newpath4.com/mega_picture_page_4_newpath4.htm
My older engine links are on this page:
http://www.newpath4.com/NNINDEX/nnindex.htm
which includes the series of "Icy Hot" links.
The rest (most) of my engines are here:
http://www.newpath4.com/paget6.htm#engines_of_newpath4_main_list_and_report_1989_til_2005
Statement against building new nuclear plants is on this page:
http://tinyurl.com/bevf9 .
Christian, I guess the Sum up is that in my mind I see a baseball pitcher
as a true hurler who can throw a ball with both arms at the same time,
and the left curve he throws & the right curve both reach home plate
together. To me, this would be synchronous power, synchronous efficiency.
And that's why I have engines that are boggling people.
I think ambidextrously; I think in terms of Total Packages; & I think in terms of Synergy.
It's evidenced by my "Ringed-Laser" solution to incoming asteroids & ICBM's:
http://www.newpath4.com/societyalsurvivalultimateengineisnotcombustion
enginenotgasolinenginenotdieselengineandefinitelynotpropulsionenginesplu
sstoppingicbmsandasteroids.htm#icbmskillerasteroidsdualsolutionintercon
nectedringedlasertrapbolo
I also like the way this page turned out: http://free.seekon.com/Strongheart10/ .
Thanks for raising the question, Christian. It needed explaining.
Last week while watching a science show about uncertainty,
I wrote a page explaining there is no such thing
as mathematical uncertainty. It isn't online.
At the same time, Jerry makes good points too. If
I had additional training I might could do a lot more.
But I'm performing a valuable service anyway.
I'm challenging people to prove I'm wrong.
School children and older students are beginning
to find my webpages. They're getting fired up because
I'm dangling the carrot as if it is bigger than WTC...
the carrot of Hope that we can make efficient
engines the likes of which have never been seen.
A carrot of Hope in our future environment. A carrot of
interplanetary travel in a few short years. And the
final carrot is the Easter Egg Hunt to prove
Riley is WRONG.
Some people the carrot is that I'll be
wrong so they can keep on dissing bipolar
people and they can throw water on newpath4.
Have a great 7-carat day.
Woody Riley 5/29/2005
