« Back to RenewAmerica

Bill Gates Windows 95 engines or XP-Linux-Sun hybrid?

Philosophy and discussion

Bill Gates Windows 95 engines or XP-Linux-Sun hybrid?

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 24th, 2005, 9:12 am

Gravity, solar radiation, lightning, a horse pulling a plough.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plough ...
These are all examples of energy that never quits. Of course the horse
will die but due to forethought we have grown another horse behind it
to take its place eh
? The new horse has been raised eating of
the crops the first horse caused to grow...

So the horse-crop is an example of perpetuality. Life & energy are perpetual.
Any engine we build that taps into observed perpetuals work for us forever
so long as we maintain the engine. So the perpetual still needs maintenance.
WHICH MEANS IT IS NOT FREE. In our physical universe, nothing comes
w/out a cost, a physical trade for a physical reap.

The wheel is such an engine, a perpetual circle with no endpoint.
We have used it extensively. Yet friction will wear it down
no matter what form it takes. Gears? Circles. Jet engines? Round.
We cannot escape that our best engines use the perpetuality of the Circle.

Friction is one of the trades we accept for the use of the physical shape of the wheel.
Friction which means Power Losses. We accept that "trade" also.
In acceptance of the negatives we admit the wheel isn't perfect.

Our present engines do one thing at a time. It is a series of one-time actions,
then the series of actions repeats. There's lots of trades, lots of waste.
Every movement has a friction cost, til, finally, the engine is so inefficient
that a heavy cooling system (radiator, poisonous antifreeze, etc.) had to be
added on. And that should tell us something very important. Any system
that is so bad it has to have other crutch systems added on is a flunky system.
Our present engines, gasoline, diesel, are such, a compilation of Add-Ons...
and the engine equivalent of WINDOWS 95. So is the fuel it uses.

Well, we don't use Windows 95 any more because we SCREAMED BLOODY MURDER
at being CHARGED FOR IT. We got SICK OF PATCHING IT.
We spent hundreds of thousands of man/woman hours updating,
formatting, running new Microsoft patches to a system we purchased
TO WORK, not strap us to a rack and stretch us til our gonads exploded.

Isn't that the same we do with our lives now? Well, perhaps not directly.
Current engine technology has reduced a lot of breakdown time.
But, how much of our time do we spend meeting car/truck payments?
But, how much of our time do we spend working to pay for the gasoline?
But, how much of our time do we spend working to pay for EPA dump cleanup?
But, how much of our time do we spend working to pay for ETC keeping a failed system running?

We spend our lives patching the system. And it drives us crazy.
My completed engine system is described on this page:
http://www.newpath4.com/enginewow.htm#compressionsuspensionsystemharvestskineticenergyofhighwayspeedbumpspotholes
It features a system of systems that all work in a circle.
It still has losses like every other engine.

Even a perfect engine has its dead horse somewhere in the cycle.
The trick is to "switch out" quickly to the next horse...
hehehehe And that's what I did.

My engine is a fast Pony Express rider system. It does not disobey the laws.
It cheats them by switching to the next horse.
EVERYONE ADMIRED the Pony Express for its EFFICIENCY.
Its Timing. Its beauty. Yet at times a rider was killed
and plenty of horses got shot or died.

Well, my engine doesn't ask anyone to die & no horses are killed.
No one has to die in Iraq to fuel-patch it and keep it running.

When you people (all of you, across the Internet) scream bloody murder
for something better than the energy wasteful engines we're now told are
the best -just as Bill Gates continued telling us about Windows 95- hehehe
you will get the engine you deserve to have:
One that doesn't run on liquid fuel crutches.
One that doesn't run via Add-Ons and patches.
One that does not use crude oil, hydrogen.
One that does not pollute the planet.
Not with antifreeze nor partially-burned hydrocarbons.

There will be & going to be plenty of engines offered to you.
At what pricetag? How many YEARS will you spend away
from your children, not taking care of your aging parents,
not having a Life you deserve, paying for an engine
worthy of Outer Space but can't get there?

You can have Windows 95B, Windows 95C, Windows 98, Windows 98SE, Windows ME, Windows XP,
or you can jump to a real engine. Just depends on how much pain you want to tolerate...
and how much you love your job... You do have a job don't you?

http://free.seekon.com/CarSizeSteamEngine/
http://www.newpath4.com/enginewow.htm
The miracle engine that runs like the miracle wheel:
http://www.google.com/search?q=newpath4+miracle+engine&num=100&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&safe=off&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-24,GGLD:en&filter=0
Others have regenerative braking; mine is regenerative force.

Automatic; per-cycle self-formatting; self-defragging; YOUR TIME IS YOUR TIME.
Your children don't get sent to Iraq to defend it.

....
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby Jerry on August 24th, 2005, 10:37 am

Self-promoting charlatan.....

"git yer snake oil right here folks"
Jerry
 
Posts: 5909
Joined: April 1st, 2005, 11:15 pm

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 24th, 2005, 11:22 am

No. Just showing you the future.
Just how ol Steve McQueen said it:
Baby the rain must fall.
Welcome to Futureworld.
You're just ticked cause you didn't "get it".
Maybe others see olive oil and good health.
Maybe others are tired of drinking your fumes.

hehehehe
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby AmazingGrace on August 24th, 2005, 3:00 pm

You tell 'em, Woody!
AmazingGrace
 
Posts: 5408
Joined: March 31st, 2005, 2:06 pm

Postby Jerry on August 24th, 2005, 10:40 pm

AmazingGrace wrote:You tell 'em, Woody!

yeah Woody, you tell 'em
Jerry
 
Posts: 5909
Joined: April 1st, 2005, 11:15 pm

Blast blast blast & blasting us all into a morgue

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 24th, 2005, 10:54 pm

Up til the late 1960's GMC was still SELLING engines for diesel trucks
that used an "air starter". Big diesel engines were started with 60 psi of AIR.
This is not the same as starting a car engine that uses gasoline.
A gas engine cylinder has an 8:1 compression but a diesel?
It's from 20:1 upwards to 24:1 compression.
Air pressure can shove 8 pistons to turning, overcoming the 22:1 compression,
which is tantamount to turning 1 piston @ (at) 176:1 compression.

Air pressure has been proven many, many times. Dr. Boese & Dr. Hertzberg took the
next logical step of using air pressure to run the engine itself!
Why don't cars have it?! What happened?! Best answer?
Cheap crude oil prices killed research dollars.

Air pressure alone doesn't have the "blast effect" of gasoline nor
of the diesel blast created by the higher diesel cylinder pressure.
Pump it into a steam-heated cylinder and there will be plenty of blast.

The power of my engine isn't just the air and it isn't just the steam.
It is the combination. This engine uses a cross-catalyst, unlike a fossil engine.
Gasoline engines are single catalyst, the gasoline working off the oxygen.
But the oxygen itself doesn't "do" anything. This is a one-way engine,
and its result is pollution.

The engine I show has 2 simultaneous operations.
The steam implodes from the cold air &
the air explodes upon clashing into the hot steam.
Imploding steam pulls the exploding air slamming into the piston.
Air; no blast. Steam; no blast. Together, cross-magnification blast.
Two inert energy-carrying substances mimic the gasoline blast
minus the chemical leftovers from combustion.

I know it is hard to accept because it is a healthy engine...

It doesn't send us to the morgue 25-50 years too soon.

Perhaps a woman's body would fight off breast cancer better

but for the planet teeming with crude oil engines
.

We need to find out. We need to try.


....
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby Jerry on August 24th, 2005, 11:36 pm

Air pressure can shove 8 pistons to turning, overcoming the 22:1 compression,
which is tantamount to turning 1 piston @ (at) 176:1 compression.

No it isn't, not at all. You THINK that because you do not know basic physics and you THINK you do!
This is just one more example of why you flunked out of college and why you think doctors are out to get you.
Jerry
 
Posts: 5909
Joined: April 1st, 2005, 11:15 pm

Postby AmazingGrace on August 25th, 2005, 7:05 am

Woody are you working on a prototype of your marvelous machine? Please say yes, we're counting on you!
AmazingGrace
 
Posts: 5408
Joined: March 31st, 2005, 2:06 pm

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 25th, 2005, 10:31 am

Amazing Grace,
it takes more than one person to start any new technology.
The days of an Edison or a Graham Bell are past.
I've done my part. I do have a car waiting for conversion.
Can't make the moves without the cash.
When the people want it it will come.

1200 mg/day of a concentrated Lithium salt didn't position me to run a race.
It positioned me for a place up at the cemetery.
Other runners are needed.
They're coming.

Perhaps the Stargate writers in British Columbia who
keep gleaning new story ideas from my posts will
contribute some money.

Woody
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby Jerry on August 25th, 2005, 10:41 am

1200 mg/day of a concentrated Lithium salt didn't position me to run a race

You should not discuss your bipolar disorder here. You need intensive therapy.
Jerry
 
Posts: 5909
Joined: April 1st, 2005, 11:15 pm

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 25th, 2005, 11:26 am

& you're still mouthing about issues you don't have capacity to understand.
Thank for for more useless advice, telling me to return
to the hemlock dispenser.

.
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

The Bipolar inventor isn't of the 4400

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 25th, 2005, 11:34 am

Since you keep wanting to drudge up the bipolar issue I'd like to state
AGAIN that many great inventors & composers are believed to have
been bipolar.

I don't think they had Lithium then. And we have their works now.
So I quit Lithium in Sept. 2002 and fixed Hertzberg's engine
in July 2003. Do the Math.


hahaha My being bipolar actually lends creedence to my conclusions.
Historical creedence noted in all encyclopedias, the gifted being bipolar.
....
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby AmazingGrace on August 25th, 2005, 4:57 pm

Woodrow Riley wrote:I do have a car waiting for conversion.
Can't make the moves without the cash.
When the people want it it will come.



Ah, yes, the cash flow problem. Have you tried
getting a government grant? Does bi-polar
qualify you as disabled, so you could
get cash to start a small business and
get the car converted?

I think what you are doing is vitally
important, and the people do want it, well at
least the people who understand what you
are aiming for and do not dismiss new ideas
out of hand as they smugly drive their SUV's
and make the Arabs rich.
AmazingGrace
 
Posts: 5408
Joined: March 31st, 2005, 2:06 pm

Postby Woodrow Riley on August 25th, 2005, 10:20 pm

I'm a newcomer. There's forward motion we don't see, aren't able to see.
Yesterday my website had 609 hits from Stockholm Sweden alone.
Once people come to understand that they could drive around
smugly or otherwise in the biggest SUV around -and not
be paying for gas- this thing is going to take off.
I've encountered plenty of negatives.

I think things will iron themselves out.
.
Woodrow Riley
 
Posts: 662
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Virginia

Postby Jerry on August 25th, 2005, 10:37 pm

Woodrow Riley wrote:I'm a newcomer. There's forward motion we don't see, aren't able to see.
Yesterday my website had 609 hits from Stockholm Sweden alone.
Once people come to understand that they could drive around
smugly or otherwise in the biggest SUV around -and not
be paying for gas- this thing is going to take off.
I've encountered plenty of negatives.

I think things will iron themselves out.
.

You think wrong as there are no investors (except stupid ones) for a charlatan.

I am sure most of the hits came from a bot that was sniffing sites with links. You have the IP addresses, check it out.

Once people come to understand that they could drive around
smugly or otherwise in the biggest SUV around -and not
be paying for gas- this thing is going to take off.


That will not happen with your flawed attempt at technology.
Jerry
 
Posts: 5909
Joined: April 1st, 2005, 11:15 pm

Next

Return to Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests