Alan Keyes
Why we should embrace 'cultural appropriation'
By Alan Keyes
According to the report I saw, a yoga group at American University spontaneously disintegrated after an "American University student...complained to AU's President's Council on Diversity and Inclusion...after seeing a non-Indian group perform an Indian epic in the school's yoga club." The episode well illustrates the insanely anti-humanitarian malice at the heart of the ill-conceived ideology that pretends to demand respect for the diverse ways in which people living in various times and places expressed their special understanding of themselves and the world in which their life unfolds.
I particularly emphasize the word "special" for good reason. Many of the same people who foment the noxious obsession with cultural ownership pretend to cherish the prospect of peace, cooperation, and unity among the world's diverse peoples. Tragi-comically, their purblind obsession with cultural "property" leads them adamantly to discourage people from celebrating the thread of shared feelings, responses, and moral judgments that allow people of goodwill to acknowledge the singular conception of humanity. Despite the different forms, coverings, and colorations we use, that conception emanates from our individual and social activities. It invites us to taste and see, try and enact, in our relations with one another, the common sense of purpose, hope, and glory that reveals, in many races, the sharable experience of one.
For those of us who, by birth or conscious choice, comprise the people of the United States, accepting this invitation is an indispensable imperative of our national identity. We have become quite literally a people comprised of individuals who come from almost every racial, cultural, political, and religious background on earth. Our sense of human justice and rights, including liberty, assumes the perspective of God, which encompasses humanity and all Creation, as a whole.
So does our sense of fellowship with other Americans. Can that sense truly exist if we are not, in mind and action, open to "trying on" the various expressions of human experience we represent? Our national identity requires the ability Atticus Finch, the character in "To Kill a Mockingbird," famously epitomized:
The warriors against "cultural appropriation" pretend to cherish peace and cooperation among people of radically different backgrounds and persuasions. But, their cultural offensive effectively subverts the imperative of wholesome humanity that, in practice, best impels Americans to seek peace and cooperation – amongst ourselves and with all nations. The effort to implement this humanitarian imperative has more than once caused us to battle amongst ourselves. Like Israel (né Jacob) wrestling with the angel of God, we have wrestled with God's wholesome intention for human community.
On account of the Christian ethos that presided over our moral conscience, the trials involved in this spiritual and moral contention led to moments of awful consequence. In violent civil and uncivil war, we battled to preserve the idea that informed our special nationhood, or else let it vanish into the mists of oblivious time. Until now, the American people have always held on to our nation's special identity. We were able to do so because, like Israel, we held fast to God, despite the strenuous effort involved in doing so.
We were able to heal the spiritual wounds our struggles inflicted because enough of us accepted the invitation to affirm the shareable nature of our differences. Enough of us sought to understand rather than simply reject them. We were particularly called to do so because our prevalent religion focused our minds upon people and places distant in time and circumstance from our own, yet present to our thoughts in the histories and songs, prophecies and parables through which the Bible conveys the tenets, examples, and practical wisdom that inform the Christian faith.
With only a modicum of reflection, it should be obvious to Americans that we cannot sustain our national identity unless, in various ways, we continue to practice the habit of "cultural appropriation" that identity politics babblers decry. People already here must do so in order to accept those who immigrate into our midst. People who immigrate must do so in order to accept and appreciate the unique assumption of common humanity inherent in our special national identity.
From its very inception, the nationalism of the people of the United States has been cast in terms of the perspective of God. This perspective impels us to revere the sharable human goods (such as justice, rights, and self-conscious knowledge) with which God endows and informs the nature of all humanity. Viewed from this perspective, to view efforts to walk in the skin of others as a criminal disposition is an insidious attack on our vocation as a people. Since God's endowment of our common humanity is the defining focus of that vocation, this attack targets humanity itself.
After all, if various peoples more and more adamantly hoard their distinctive expressions of humankind's potential, the conception of humanity will be torn to shreds. It will disintegrate, like the yoga group at American University. I suspect that "cultural appropriation" warriors' campaign aims to promote this disintegration. They target efforts to "walk in the other person's skin" no matter how sincerely and respectfully they are pursued. Their goal is to poison the wellspring of goodwill that feeds the confluent streams of God-endowed humanity the people of the United States have come to embody, and ought to preserve, as a hopeful example for all the world.
December 24, 2018
According to the report I saw, a yoga group at American University spontaneously disintegrated after an "American University student...complained to AU's President's Council on Diversity and Inclusion...after seeing a non-Indian group perform an Indian epic in the school's yoga club." The episode well illustrates the insanely anti-humanitarian malice at the heart of the ill-conceived ideology that pretends to demand respect for the diverse ways in which people living in various times and places expressed their special understanding of themselves and the world in which their life unfolds.
I particularly emphasize the word "special" for good reason. Many of the same people who foment the noxious obsession with cultural ownership pretend to cherish the prospect of peace, cooperation, and unity among the world's diverse peoples. Tragi-comically, their purblind obsession with cultural "property" leads them adamantly to discourage people from celebrating the thread of shared feelings, responses, and moral judgments that allow people of goodwill to acknowledge the singular conception of humanity. Despite the different forms, coverings, and colorations we use, that conception emanates from our individual and social activities. It invites us to taste and see, try and enact, in our relations with one another, the common sense of purpose, hope, and glory that reveals, in many races, the sharable experience of one.
For those of us who, by birth or conscious choice, comprise the people of the United States, accepting this invitation is an indispensable imperative of our national identity. We have become quite literally a people comprised of individuals who come from almost every racial, cultural, political, and religious background on earth. Our sense of human justice and rights, including liberty, assumes the perspective of God, which encompasses humanity and all Creation, as a whole.
So does our sense of fellowship with other Americans. Can that sense truly exist if we are not, in mind and action, open to "trying on" the various expressions of human experience we represent? Our national identity requires the ability Atticus Finch, the character in "To Kill a Mockingbird," famously epitomized:
-
"First of all," he said, "if you can learn a simple trick, Scout, you'll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view – ...until you climb into his skin and walk around in it."
The warriors against "cultural appropriation" pretend to cherish peace and cooperation among people of radically different backgrounds and persuasions. But, their cultural offensive effectively subverts the imperative of wholesome humanity that, in practice, best impels Americans to seek peace and cooperation – amongst ourselves and with all nations. The effort to implement this humanitarian imperative has more than once caused us to battle amongst ourselves. Like Israel (né Jacob) wrestling with the angel of God, we have wrestled with God's wholesome intention for human community.
On account of the Christian ethos that presided over our moral conscience, the trials involved in this spiritual and moral contention led to moments of awful consequence. In violent civil and uncivil war, we battled to preserve the idea that informed our special nationhood, or else let it vanish into the mists of oblivious time. Until now, the American people have always held on to our nation's special identity. We were able to do so because, like Israel, we held fast to God, despite the strenuous effort involved in doing so.
We were able to heal the spiritual wounds our struggles inflicted because enough of us accepted the invitation to affirm the shareable nature of our differences. Enough of us sought to understand rather than simply reject them. We were particularly called to do so because our prevalent religion focused our minds upon people and places distant in time and circumstance from our own, yet present to our thoughts in the histories and songs, prophecies and parables through which the Bible conveys the tenets, examples, and practical wisdom that inform the Christian faith.
With only a modicum of reflection, it should be obvious to Americans that we cannot sustain our national identity unless, in various ways, we continue to practice the habit of "cultural appropriation" that identity politics babblers decry. People already here must do so in order to accept those who immigrate into our midst. People who immigrate must do so in order to accept and appreciate the unique assumption of common humanity inherent in our special national identity.
From its very inception, the nationalism of the people of the United States has been cast in terms of the perspective of God. This perspective impels us to revere the sharable human goods (such as justice, rights, and self-conscious knowledge) with which God endows and informs the nature of all humanity. Viewed from this perspective, to view efforts to walk in the skin of others as a criminal disposition is an insidious attack on our vocation as a people. Since God's endowment of our common humanity is the defining focus of that vocation, this attack targets humanity itself.
After all, if various peoples more and more adamantly hoard their distinctive expressions of humankind's potential, the conception of humanity will be torn to shreds. It will disintegrate, like the yoga group at American University. I suspect that "cultural appropriation" warriors' campaign aims to promote this disintegration. They target efforts to "walk in the other person's skin" no matter how sincerely and respectfully they are pursued. Their goal is to poison the wellspring of goodwill that feeds the confluent streams of God-endowed humanity the people of the United States have come to embody, and ought to preserve, as a hopeful example for all the world.
To see more articles by Dr. Keyes, visit his blog at LoyalToLiberty.com and his commentary at WND.com and BarbWire.com.
© Alan KeyesThe views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
