Matt C. Abbott
Pro-life internist likes Santorum, but pleads for consistency on Title X
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Matt C. Abbott
February 29, 2012

Chris Kahlenborn, M.D., respected internist and founder/president of The Polycarp Research Institute, writes (slightly edited):
    I like Rick Santorum a lot. I like his family values. I like his persistence. And I love his love for unborn children, especially those with genetic problems. However, I do have a problem with his inconsistency regarding Title X funding.

    Mr. Santorum has publicly stated that he believes contraception harms women and families; and that Plan B may act as an abortifacient. He has also stated that he supported, and still supports, Title X funding to family planning agencies that supply both oral contraceptives and Plan B to their clientele.

    In regard to contraception and Plan B, Mr. Santorum may have a better command of the medical literature than people give him credit for. Consider the following: In 2005, the World Health Organization classified oral contraceptives as a Group I carcinogen — the most dangerous type of classification known.

    Thereafter, I and three colleagues published the most meta-analysis to date regarding early oral contraceptive use and breast cancer in the October 2006 Mayo Clinic Proceedings. We noted that 21 out of 23 studies found positive links to breast cancer, which came to a 44 percent increased cumulative risk (significant at the 99 percent confidence interval).

    In regard to Plan B, the 2010 Physician's Desk Reference notes that it 'may inhibit implantation by altering the endometrium.' In addition, Croxatto et al noted that Plan B only fully stops ovulation 12 percent of the time when given within two days of ovulation (Contraception, 2004: 442-450), again supporting an abortifacient method of action.

    Mr. Santorum's inconsistency regarding his statements on Plan B and contraception are rivaled only by his inconsistency regarding his statements on Title X funding. Consider how confusing his recent words have been: 'I support Title X, I guess it is, and have voted for contraception and although I don't think it works, I think it's harmful to women, I think it's harmful to our society.'

    How can he rightly cite the dangers of hormonal contraception and the abortifacient action of Plan B, yet continue to justify spending for Title X funding, which grants over $300 million to family planning agencies that dispense contraception and Plan B? In addition, Planned Parenthood receives about $70 million from Title X funding annually.

    Both Mr. Romney and Mr. Paul, and the audience, picked up on Mr. Santorum's inconsistency in the Feb. 22 CNN-sponsored debate. Mr. Santorum was booed when he tried to justify his record on Title X — and he deserved it. Of note: Prior to this blunder, he was running more than 10 points ahead of Mr. Romney in Michigan; his lead evaporated after the debate and he went on to lose the state.

    Should Mr. Santorum survive the primaries, President Obama — a master of taking advantage of his opponents' weaknesses — will have little trouble exploiting Mr. Santorum's stance.

    Mr. Santorum has precedent to follow. In 2010, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie cut family planning funding citing budget concerns, noting: 'I don't believe that is a priority in a budget where you have to cut $11 billion. I believe that women have the opportunity to access health care all across New Jersey. Family planning has nothing to do with mammograms, and don't put the two of them together.'

    Mr. Santorum could justify defunding Title X with the same secular argument. After all, how many of us Americans really want to pay $300 million annually of our money for other people's contraceptives when we as a nation are $15 trillion in debt?

    Mr. Santorum has the strongest and clearest conservative record of all the Republican nominees, and uses the word 'courage' to describe himself. His strength has always been his great leadership in family and moral matters.

    Our nation's moral fabric has deteriorated rapidly over the past five decades, and this election will be a referendum not only on the economy, but perhaps even more so on the direction of our moral fabric.

    Mr. Santorum is in a unique position to fill that void: Now he must embrace and articulate his vision without compromise or inconsistency. A clear statement on the elimination of Title X funding would be a most courageous and consistent step for the next potential President of the United States.
© Matt C. Abbott

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Matt C. Abbott

Matt C. Abbott is a Catholic commentator with a Bachelor of Arts degree in communication, media and theatre from Northeastern Illinois University. He also has an Associate in Applied Science degree in business management from Triton College. Abbott has been interviewed on MSNBC, Bill Martinez Live, WOSU Radio in Ohio, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's 2019 "Unsolved" podcast about the unsolved murder of Father Alfred Kunz, WLS-TV (ABC) in Chicago, WMTV (NBC) and WISC-TV (CBS) in Madison, Wis., and has been quoted in The New York Times, the Chicago Tribune and other media outlets. He is mentioned in the 2020 Report on the Holy See's Institutional Knowledge and Decision-Making Related to Former Cardinal Theodore Edgar McCarrick (1930 to 2017), which can be found on the Vatican's website. He can be reached at mattcabbott@gmail.com.

(Note: I welcome and appreciate thoughtful feedback. Insults will be ignored. Only in very select cases will I honor a request to have a telephone conversation about a topic in my column. Email is much preferred. God bless you and please keep me in your prayers!)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Matt C. Abbott: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Stephen Stone
In defense of Sen. Mike Lee

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Statement on overturning of Roe v. Wade

Tom DeWeese
Cancel Culture is cancelling itself

Linda Goudsmit
The Dr. Duke Show: June 23, 2022 Linda Goudsmit discusses the global takeover of American education

Tom DeWeese
We must harden our schools – mentally and physically – Here’s how and why

Curtis Dahlgren
'Don't weep for the dead; weep for the living.' – Jeremiah

Michael Bresciani
Nancy Pelosi says drag queens are what America is all about!

Jerry Newcombe
Violence in the name of “Jane’s revenge”

Peter Lemiska
The January 6th hearings – A pathetic act of desperation

Victor Sharpe
A nuclear Iran in our world

Selwyn Duke
Why Bill Maher can’t kick his Democrat Party addiction

Paul Cameron
Southern Baptists did a decent job protecting kids
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites