A.J. Castellitto
Manufactured consent in mainstream science
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By A.J. Castellitto
October 9, 2017

While recently watching a video of my chatty daughter as a toddler, I thought of how babies are seemingly hardwired to develop language. This reality is not something that can just be explained away by some carnally contrived theory of origins.

In his review of Berwick and Chomsky's Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, First Things' Stephen Barr notes how "only humans are rational; and for Berwick and Chomsky, human language is primarily an instrument of rationality."

https://www.firstthings.com/article/2017/04/first-words

Personally, I don't think the scientific community engages in outright lies or propaganda for political purposes, but as far as their blind commitment to Darwinism is concerned, it is not mere conjecture to propose that they push the boundaries of the scientific method. To put it more bluntly, they practically defy their own rules, the universal rules of science no less, in this and many other vital areas of study and analysis. At least, that's the impression, based on much of the information deemed suitable for mainstream consumption and acceptance. https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/03/08/manufacturing-consent-in-science-the-diabolical-twist-2/

In their blind allegiance to the evolution of man, they shamelessly declare 1 + 2 = 300 and do so without being able to demonstrate mathematically (i.e. using the scientific method) how they got there. That's a major problem that can't be dismissed, credentials, bravado, and manufactured consent notwithstanding. True skeptics -not deniers- see right through such things.


Too much of what passes for science has fallen prey to this manufactured consent phenomenon so prevalent in today's political and cultural climate and so commonly used as a sledgehammer to drive public opinion in a predetermined direction. The lack of biological basis for progressive gender theories reveals the predominantly ideological, neo-gnostic thought that underpins their scientific proofs (i.e. Bill Nye's recent netflix fiasco on the subject of gender and sex) and are ultimately anything but.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/bill-nyes-netflix-show-bashes-christian-views-on-s/

© A.J. Castellitto

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Selwyn Duke
Race and IQ: A high school science fair project ignites a storm

Larry Klayman
Larry Klayman seeks appointment as special counsel to root out Mueller, et al.

Bryan Fischer
Why school shootings: not enough God, not enough guns

A.J. Castellitto
The rise of Rachael DenHollander

Jerry Newcombe
Warnings from the Founding Fathers on our reckless national spending and debt

Rev. Austin Miles
FDR's 'New Deal' Social Security Act just that

A.J. Castellitto
How the Deep State promotes, exploits and condemns 'Islamophobia'

Alan Keyes
Do dueling memos foreshadow ruins of liberty?

Larry Klayman
Time to remove Mueller and prosecute the Clintons

Bryan Fischer
Leftist author thinks Bible is "badly written" - is she right?

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Unprecedented increase in midlife white death rate for NC. Why?

Michael Oberndorf
Like a ton of bricks
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites