A.J. Castellitto
Manufactured consent in mainstream science
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By A.J. Castellitto
October 9, 2017

While recently watching a video of my chatty daughter as a toddler, I thought of how babies are seemingly hardwired to develop language. This reality is not something that can just be explained away by some carnally contrived theory of origins.

In his review of Berwick and Chomsky's Why Only Us: Language and Evolution, First Things' Stephen Barr notes how "only humans are rational; and for Berwick and Chomsky, human language is primarily an instrument of rationality."

https://www.firstthings.com/article/2017/04/first-words

Personally, I don't think the scientific community engages in outright lies or propaganda for political purposes, but as far as their blind commitment to Darwinism is concerned, it is not mere conjecture to propose that they push the boundaries of the scientific method. To put it more bluntly, they practically defy their own rules, the universal rules of science no less, in this and many other vital areas of study and analysis. At least, that's the impression, based on much of the information deemed suitable for mainstream consumption and acceptance. https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/03/08/manufacturing-consent-in-science-the-diabolical-twist-2/

In their blind allegiance to the evolution of man, they shamelessly declare 1 + 2 = 300 and do so without being able to demonstrate mathematically (i.e. using the scientific method) how they got there. That's a major problem that can't be dismissed, credentials, bravado, and manufactured consent notwithstanding. True skeptics -not deniers- see right through such things.


Too much of what passes for science has fallen prey to this manufactured consent phenomenon so prevalent in today's political and cultural climate and so commonly used as a sledgehammer to drive public opinion in a predetermined direction. The lack of biological basis for progressive gender theories reveals the predominantly ideological, neo-gnostic thought that underpins their scientific proofs (i.e. Bill Nye's recent netflix fiasco on the subject of gender and sex) and are ultimately anything but.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/25/bill-nyes-netflix-show-bashes-christian-views-on-s/

© A.J. Castellitto

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Marsha West
A whole lotta 'Christian' bestsellers are unfit for Christian consumption

Publius Huldah
USMCA "Trade Agreement", the North American Union, an Article V convention, and Red Flag Laws: Connecting the dots

Judie Brown
Babies by the numbers

Stanley Zir
The battle for the soul of our nation has begun

Bryan Fischer
Dan Cathy dishonors the memory of his father

Sher Zieve
The Democrat Party: An existential threat to the U.S. Constitution and the USA

Rev. Austin Miles
What really is behind impeachment insanity!

Jerry Newcombe
The Salvation Army a 'hate' group? Preposterous!

Cliff Kincaid
Mayor Pete and Jeffrey Epstein: Spawn of the sexual revolution

Judie Brown
The long march to imposed death

Bryan Fischer
Democrats are impeaching Trump's thoughts, not his actions

Larry Klayman
Duke basketball and the nation's decline
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites