Rev. Mark H. Creech
July 26, 2007
A baby's blood cries out
By Rev. Mark H. Creech

The web site justice4jenna.org describes "an amazing and wonderful" young woman who was a "talented pianist, dancer and singer." The site's photo gallery shows a series of pictures of Jenna Nielsen, 22, as playful and humorous — someone who obviously relished in being a wife and mother.

Jenna was expecting the birth of her third child, Ethen, with whom she was eight months pregnant, when tragically on June 14th some unknown assailant murdered her while she restocked USA Today newspaper vending machines in Raleigh.

Now her family not only seeks justice by offering a $10,000 reward for information leading to the identification, arrests, and conviction of her killer, but also by pressuring legislators to change state law to recognize the death of unborn children as separate victims of similar crimes.

Unfortunately, North Carolina is one of only 14 states that do not have a fetal homicide law. In an interview with Raleigh's WRAL News, Kevin Blaine, Jenna Nielsen's father, lamented: "An unborn child should be recognized if the mother's killed...Right now they recognize my daughter's murder. But they don't recognize my unborn grandson's murder or as a person, for that matter."

This year in the General Assembly, Rep. Trudi Walend and Senator Andrew Brock attempted to change this deficit in the law — even before Nielsen's murder occurred. Their bills were shuffled off to committees where they were never allowed to get a hearing.

The stiffest opposition to the proposed law change comes from abortion rights advocates. According to USA Today, Janet Crepps, a staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, says, "fetal homicide laws are part of a broader agenda by abortion opponents to create legal rights for a fetus in order to set precedents that will help ban the procedure."

Yet prominent legal scholars who support Roe v. Wade say fetal homicide bills do not necessarily conflict with Roe. Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, in Fundamental Cases: The Twentieth Century; Court Battles that Changed our Nation, says: "And to prove that we all believe fetuses have certain status different from a, for example, sperm or egg, we would all agree that if a woman were pregnant and desperately wanted to have a child, and a man attacked her and beat her stomach purposely in order to kill that fetus, that that would be an extremely serious crime. Even if the mother herself wasn't hurt, killing of the fetus would be a serious crime when done against a woman who wanted to give birth to the child. So we know that the fetus in the body of a woman who wants to bear it as a child has a protected legal status — it ought to have a protected legal status..."

Indeed, it should have a protected legal status. But that's not the case in the Tar Heel state. In fact, in this state, if Jenna Nielsen had survived and baby Ethen had not, the charge would have only been aggravated assault.

One can only wonder where the same zeal of pro-choice advocates goes when it comes to recognizing and protecting the rights of a woman who obviously wanted to have her baby as opposed to someone who doesn't. Jenna Nielsen's mother told the Raleigh News & Observer's Ruth Sheehan that her "sons were as real to her in the womb as if she were holding them...She couldn't wait for Ethen to be born."

What real meaning does a term like "pro-choice" have if it doesn't honor by law the choice of mothers that opt for life?

The Old Testament book of Genesis says that when Abel was murdered, his blood cried out to God from the ground. Media reports say that when law enforcement officials discovered Jenna Nielsen's body, it was a gruesome bloody scene. If the blood of one murder victim cries out to God from the ground, how much greater is the cry of two?

Perhaps the greater question is whether North Carolina will hear the cries of both Jenna and Ethen's blood for justice.

This editorial first appeared in the Raleigh News and Observer on July 19, 2007.

© Rev. Mark H. Creech

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Rev. Mark H. Creech

Rev. Mark H. Creech is Executive Director of the Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc.... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Rev. Mark H. Creech: Click here

Latest articles

 

Alan Keyes
Why de facto government (tyranny) is replacing the Constitution (Apr. 2015)

Stephen Stone
Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress? (Nov. 2014)

Alan Keyes
In battle for liberty, lying is the 'WMD'

Cliff Kincaid
Does Hillary hate white people?

Larry Klayman
Hillary's email cover-up compromised judges and DOJ

Rev. Mark H. Creech
The lioness of persecution

Jim Terry
The irrelevant news media--Part I

J. Matt Barber
The entire 'LGBT' narrative just crumbled

Michael Bresciani
Hillary dips to new low, labels Trump and millions of Americans -- racists and Nazis

Rev. Austin Miles
Six week old baby murdered by her father

Michael Gaynor
Will Kellyanne Conway and Laura Ingraham enable Donald Trump to make America great again?

William Wagner
The necessity of appointing a Special Counsel

Bryan Fischer
God has not called us to be nice

Lloyd Marcus
The left's war on American dreamers
  More columns

Cartoons


Michael Ramirez
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites