Selwyn Duke
December 29, 2012
What would Jesus shoot?
By Selwyn Duke

A co-religionist friend of mine asked some years ago, "What is the [Catholic] Church's teaching on firearms...?

Does it recommend an assault rifle or a shotgun?"

He was kidding, of course, but not so funny are some recent attempts by liberal "Christians" to turn Jesus into Sarah Brady. Motivated by their unique brand of religiosity in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, they say that the Lord would never condone gun ownership. Why, didn't He state, "[A]ll that take the sword shall perish with the sword"?

Were I to steal a leaf out of the liberals' book, I'd now become conveniently literalistic and say that if anyone wants to consider sword control, I'm game. But let's address the matter seriously.

When the temple guards of the Sanhedrin came to the Garden of Gethsemane to arrest Jesus, the apostle Simon Peter leapt to the Lord's defense, drew his sword, and sliced off the ear of a slave accompanying the guards. This is where the quoted Bible passage comes into play. The gospel of Matthew (26:52) tells us that Jesus rebuked Peter, saying, "Put up again thy sword into its place: for all that take the sword shall perish with the sword." Quite a pacifist message, huh?

Yet there's something generally overlooked here. Peter only had a sword to draw because he had one on his person — and Jesus obviously took no issue with this. In fact, even during Jesus' rebuke, He never told Peter to throw his sword away. The command was simply to resheath it.

Why? Perhaps because Jesus had actually ordered the apostles to acquire swords. As Luke 23:36-38 tells us:
    "But now he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise a scrip; and he that hath not, let him sell his coat, and buy a sword. For I say to you, that this that is written must yet be fulfilled in me: 'And with the wicked was he reckoned.' For the things concerning me have an end." But they said: "Lord, behold here are two swords." And he said to them, "It is enough."
So what is the actual meaning of Jesus' words in Matthew? I won't say anything definitively, but I will note that the relevant line has often been interpreted to mean "He who lives by the sword shall die by it also." And, of course, there's as big a difference between legitimate self-defense and living by the gun as there is between respecting the state's legitimate role and living by government.

So what would Jesus shoot? Nothing, I'm sure. He wouldn't get married, either; His role wasn't exactly the same as ours. But I'm also sure that a clear understanding of Christianity shoots the liberal arguments right out of the sky.

(Hat tip: the readers who emailed me the Luke reference.)

© Selwyn Duke

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Selwyn Duke

Selwyn Duke is a writer, columnist and public speaker whose work has been published widely online and in print, on both the local and national levels. He has been featured on the Rush Limbaugh Show and has been a regular guest on the award-winning Michael Savage Show. His work has appeared in Pat Buchanan's magazine The American Conservative and he writes regularly for The New American and Christian Music Perspective.

Contact Selwyn Duke, follow him on Twitter or log on to SelwynDuke.com

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Selwyn Duke: Click here

Latest articles

April 4, 2016
If bakers can be forced to service faux weddings, so can churches


March 19, 2016
Death of America: Why this presidential election isn't as important as people think


February 26, 2016
Cupcake Kasich is a (rather dull) tyrant enabler


February 17, 2016
Did Justice Scalia already give us the solution to the problem of filling his seat?


February 6, 2016
NAACP head can use bad language when complaining about language because he's "one of the best guys"


February 5, 2016
How to avoid being raped? Just say no


February 1, 2016
GOP debate: Trump was the winner


January 27, 2016
Is Trump the first "European-conservative" American presidential candidate?


January 26, 2016
The Trump love affair explained in terms even Beltway pundits can understand


January 20, 2016
Trump, Cruz and New York values


More articles

 

Alan Keyes
Why de facto government (tyranny) is replacing the Constitution (Apr. 2015)

Stephen Stone
Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress? (Nov. 2014)

Cliff Kincaid
The sad demise of a once-Catholic university

Bryan Fischer
Which candidate will protect our daughters?

Dan Popp
The war on God goes to the bathroom

J. Matt Barber
Why atheists are 'fools'

Kevin Fobbs
Can Trump beat Sanders' socialist revolution if both meet in November?

Sher Zieve
The final destruction of the US Southern border?

Michael Gaynor
Blame Sean Hannity for supporting Cruz and helping Hillary, NOT for supporting Trump

Rev. Austin Miles
Transgender installed as D.C. church pastor!

Alan Keyes
If we encourage abandonment of truth, can it be love?

Cliff Kincaid
Trump hires "fixer" with Soviet connections

Sylvia Thompson
Rending the nation: Obama and his Treasury Department's scheme

Tim Dunkin
Supporters of "transgenderism" are off-target
  More columns

Cartoons


Michael Ramirez
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites