Bryan Fischer
Let's put birthright citizenship out of our misery
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Bryan Fischer
September 21, 2017

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"

Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-F www.afr.net

One of the most pernicious distortions of the plain meaning of the Constitution is the conceit that U.S. citizenship automatically belongs to anyone born in America.

It doesn't.

A correct interpretation and application of the 14th Amendment makes this clear. This amendment, ratified in 1868, was enacted for one simple purpose: to grant citizenship to former slaves who had been born on American soil. The 13th Amendment abolished the institution of slavery, and the 14th Amendment granted American citizenship to the emancipated slaves. Citizenship had been denied them by the dreadful Dred Scott decision of 1857.

Here's how the first sentence of the 14th Amendment reads (emphasis mine throughout):

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

It's not enough simply to be born on U.S. soil. One must also "be subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States when it happens. No child born to illegal aliens is subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. for the simple reason that his parents aren't.

This is why the children of diplomats, children born in America, are never considered citizens by birth. Because their parents are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, neither are they.

This is not complicated. Illegal aliens by definition are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. They, like diplomats, are "subject to the jurisdiction" of their homeland. Illegal aliens are called "illegal" aliens for the precise reason that they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, which is why they can be be deported once apprehended. Legally and constitutionally, their children are no more "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. than their parents are.

Daniel Sobieski points out that Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the 14th Amendment, explained the language of the amendment this way: "every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your constitution itself a natural born citizen..."

As Liz Peek writes:
    The United States is one of only two developed countries in the world that still bestows citizenship on every person born on our nation's soil. Having a child become a U.S. citizen is the greatest reward possible for someone who enters the country illegally. Such status is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in free education and benefits, not to mention the incalculable value of our country's security and freedoms. Historically, there was bipartisan enthusiasm for dumping this program; even Democrat Harry Reid had proposed its termination.
Sobieski also points out that if everybody understood that citizenship was granted by birth alone, why did it take an act of Congress in 1922–54 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment – to grant citizenship to American Indians, everyone of whom had been born on American soil?

The Heritage Foundation estimated some time ago that the average illegal alien consumes $32,000 per year of welfare benefits while contributing but $10,000 to the economy. The cost of illegal immigration, especially when chain migration is added to the mix, is staggering, and it's made worse by dangling the carrot of lifelong citizenship for the children of border trespassers.

It's no wonder that "birth tourism" is a thing. Birth tourism is when pregnant women from all over the world time a trip to the U.S. just to give birth to their child on American soil.

To get rid of birthright citizenship, we do not need to amend the Constitution. We only need to apply it. And the sooner, the better.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

© Bryan Fischer

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Cliff Kincaid
The Red Chinese lied, Americans died, and Americans prayed

Deborah Stevenson
The Harvard "Summit"--A continuation of erosion of parental rights--same sheep, different clot

Rev. Austin Miles
The ultimate 'how to' instructions for virus

Lloyd Marcus
Will Trump betray us after corona?

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Jesus the King: Model for exemplary political leadership

Tabitha Korol
Humiliation, a pretext for murder

Michael Bresciani
Stop the dying but keep on killing – lib hypocrisy soaring to new heights

Bryan Fischer
Christians are "crippling" coronavirus response? It's Democrats!

Cherie Zaslawsky
America's March of Madness

Jerry Newcombe
The NYT blames Christians for poor coronavirus response

Tom DeWeese
How the Green New Deal is creeping across America

Frank Maguire
Dr. Joseph Sonnabend: immuno-suppression and AIDS (HIV in Africa...and population control foundations)
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites