Gabriel Garnica
Look who's calling who racist!
By Gabriel Garnica
Anyone doubting that Democrats in particular and liberals in general are so delusional as to merit official categorization as mentally ill need only take a peek at the pearls of wisdom coming from James Carville and Paul Begala.
Let's Define Racism
Merriam-Webster defines racism as "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and those racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."
Simply stated, it is racist for anyone to ever assume that a given race will act in a certain way simply because of its race. People who believe that all Latinos have thick accents, sleep a lot, are migrant workers, drop out of school, watch soap operas or eat enchiladas are racists. Those who believe that all Asian-Americans are good in math, bad at hockey or go around fighting karate are racists. Anyone who declares that African-Americans all eat watermelons, fried chicken, father illegitimate children, play basketball or tap dance are racists.
We have seen everyone from Al Campanis to Don Imus get grilled for making idiotic, insensitive declarations based on assumptions about race. A nanosecond is the amount of time it takes a liberal to bash any conservative daring to utter anything mildly insensitive, stupid or foolish based on racial assumptions. Eternity, on the other hand, is the amount of time one will wait to see a liberal bashed for making the same asinine comment.
In the world of liberals racism has two definitions and two applications. The first is strict, forceful and exacting and is applied to conservatives. The second is loose, shifting and vague and is applied to liberals. Living by two standards is about as liberal as burning bras, disrespected crucifixes and an abortionist's scalpel.
Here Come The Riots
Commenting on what would happen in the cataclysmic event that The Anointed One should lose, James Carville informed us that it would be "traumatic out there" with rioting and all kinds of unrest. His assumption, of course, is that Blacks are so politically and socially immature that their only response to defeat is violence. Have you ever heard anyone utter that Whites will destroy property and loot stores if a White candidate loses? Of course not, and this is because the assumption is that Whites are somehow civilized and in control of themselves.
To declare that Blacks' likely response to political disappointment is chaos is to imply that Blacks have the maturity and intelligence of unruly children, which fits my definition of racism any day of the week. It also fits my definition of hypocrisy, since liberals like Carville are always painting Democrats as enlightened, noble crusaders of social justice, equality and intelligence and Republicans as either arrogant, elitist, out-of-touch rich people or ignorant, praying hicks living in the sticks all united by racial intolerance.
I submit that James Carville's comment about Blacks rioting if Obama loses is as racist as it gets but, of course, since such an asinine statement comes from the mouth and mind of a liberal, it is a deep political observation and warning. At least, it assumes that all Blacks react like crazy fiends when things do not go their way. At worst, it incites, rationalizes and justifies such behavior, giving a free pass to any wishing to fulfill that prediction. Justifying and rationalizing violence because of prior injustice or oppression is nothing new to liberals, who actually began lecturing us on why we had it coming on 9-11.
Pointing Fingers a Liberal Obsession
Not to be outdone by Carville's imbecilic remark, his long-time partner in political crime, Paul Begala, cited the Associated Press on Sarah Palin, noting "they said her attack on this whole Bill Ayers thing was 'racially-tinged.' That's not what a Democrat said, that's what the Associated Press said." To imply some sort of distinction between the mainstream press and the Democratic Party is the height of delusion and denial.
Adding fuel to the fire, we need only look at the uproar over McCain's reference to Obama as "that one" during the last debate. Everybody from Jeff Greenfield to Katie Couric to CNN rushed to declare this a significant talking point and waved countless deeply offended and traumatized people as a result. Blackvoices.com and other sources presented us with polls finding that most people found the comment childish and disrespectful or outrageous.
Barack Obama sits at the feet of Jeremiah Wright's racial rants for twenty years and he is not a racist. He is buddies with Bill Ayers and he does not have questionable judgment regarding his associations. Sarah Palin dares to refer to the Ayers connection and she is a racist. John McCain refers to the media's Anointed One as "that one" and he is disrespectful and dismissive. You cannot, and would not, make any of this up in your worst fiction tragedy, comedy or anything else.
Typical Liberal Rubbish
The bottom line on the latest imbecilic comments by Carville and Begala is that Americans will have hell to pay if they dare not vote for Barack Hussein Obama. To not vote for this Anointed One of the press is to label oneself completely and permanently a racist. To dare to even consider not casting one's vote Obama's way is to endanger American order and safety and invite social unrest. The winds of fate and destiny have spoken, and beware those who dare to stand in the way of America's upcoming new horizon of liberal paradise. In typical fashion, liberals reveal themselves to be hypocritical racists who pat minorities on the head, declare their eternal vow of protection in exchange for votes and proceed to spew and spread racism themselves like butter on a toast.
Conclusion
To hear James Carville and Paul Begala spew their asinine observations is to come face to face with the delusion and denial that is American liberalism today. Their accusations of racism and racial unrest are classic examples of liberal racism at its best.
We have reached the pathetic point when liberal hacks pretend to be objective pundits and spew the most insulting brands of biased and slanted observations fashioned as news. We have sunk to the point where we need wonder and worry if enough Americans will be stupid enough to buy the fertilizer that places like CNN, CBS and MSNBC sell as objective reporting.
As we approach the most important election in American history, we must wear the highest boots possible to wade through the slime that is mainstream media today.
© Gabriel Garnica
Anyone doubting that Democrats in particular and liberals in general are so delusional as to merit official categorization as mentally ill need only take a peek at the pearls of wisdom coming from James Carville and Paul Begala.
Let's Define Racism
Merriam-Webster defines racism as "a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and those racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."
Simply stated, it is racist for anyone to ever assume that a given race will act in a certain way simply because of its race. People who believe that all Latinos have thick accents, sleep a lot, are migrant workers, drop out of school, watch soap operas or eat enchiladas are racists. Those who believe that all Asian-Americans are good in math, bad at hockey or go around fighting karate are racists. Anyone who declares that African-Americans all eat watermelons, fried chicken, father illegitimate children, play basketball or tap dance are racists.
We have seen everyone from Al Campanis to Don Imus get grilled for making idiotic, insensitive declarations based on assumptions about race. A nanosecond is the amount of time it takes a liberal to bash any conservative daring to utter anything mildly insensitive, stupid or foolish based on racial assumptions. Eternity, on the other hand, is the amount of time one will wait to see a liberal bashed for making the same asinine comment.
In the world of liberals racism has two definitions and two applications. The first is strict, forceful and exacting and is applied to conservatives. The second is loose, shifting and vague and is applied to liberals. Living by two standards is about as liberal as burning bras, disrespected crucifixes and an abortionist's scalpel.
Here Come The Riots
Commenting on what would happen in the cataclysmic event that The Anointed One should lose, James Carville informed us that it would be "traumatic out there" with rioting and all kinds of unrest. His assumption, of course, is that Blacks are so politically and socially immature that their only response to defeat is violence. Have you ever heard anyone utter that Whites will destroy property and loot stores if a White candidate loses? Of course not, and this is because the assumption is that Whites are somehow civilized and in control of themselves.
To declare that Blacks' likely response to political disappointment is chaos is to imply that Blacks have the maturity and intelligence of unruly children, which fits my definition of racism any day of the week. It also fits my definition of hypocrisy, since liberals like Carville are always painting Democrats as enlightened, noble crusaders of social justice, equality and intelligence and Republicans as either arrogant, elitist, out-of-touch rich people or ignorant, praying hicks living in the sticks all united by racial intolerance.
I submit that James Carville's comment about Blacks rioting if Obama loses is as racist as it gets but, of course, since such an asinine statement comes from the mouth and mind of a liberal, it is a deep political observation and warning. At least, it assumes that all Blacks react like crazy fiends when things do not go their way. At worst, it incites, rationalizes and justifies such behavior, giving a free pass to any wishing to fulfill that prediction. Justifying and rationalizing violence because of prior injustice or oppression is nothing new to liberals, who actually began lecturing us on why we had it coming on 9-11.
Pointing Fingers a Liberal Obsession
Not to be outdone by Carville's imbecilic remark, his long-time partner in political crime, Paul Begala, cited the Associated Press on Sarah Palin, noting "they said her attack on this whole Bill Ayers thing was 'racially-tinged.' That's not what a Democrat said, that's what the Associated Press said." To imply some sort of distinction between the mainstream press and the Democratic Party is the height of delusion and denial.
Adding fuel to the fire, we need only look at the uproar over McCain's reference to Obama as "that one" during the last debate. Everybody from Jeff Greenfield to Katie Couric to CNN rushed to declare this a significant talking point and waved countless deeply offended and traumatized people as a result. Blackvoices.com and other sources presented us with polls finding that most people found the comment childish and disrespectful or outrageous.
Barack Obama sits at the feet of Jeremiah Wright's racial rants for twenty years and he is not a racist. He is buddies with Bill Ayers and he does not have questionable judgment regarding his associations. Sarah Palin dares to refer to the Ayers connection and she is a racist. John McCain refers to the media's Anointed One as "that one" and he is disrespectful and dismissive. You cannot, and would not, make any of this up in your worst fiction tragedy, comedy or anything else.
Typical Liberal Rubbish
The bottom line on the latest imbecilic comments by Carville and Begala is that Americans will have hell to pay if they dare not vote for Barack Hussein Obama. To not vote for this Anointed One of the press is to label oneself completely and permanently a racist. To dare to even consider not casting one's vote Obama's way is to endanger American order and safety and invite social unrest. The winds of fate and destiny have spoken, and beware those who dare to stand in the way of America's upcoming new horizon of liberal paradise. In typical fashion, liberals reveal themselves to be hypocritical racists who pat minorities on the head, declare their eternal vow of protection in exchange for votes and proceed to spew and spread racism themselves like butter on a toast.
Conclusion
To hear James Carville and Paul Begala spew their asinine observations is to come face to face with the delusion and denial that is American liberalism today. Their accusations of racism and racial unrest are classic examples of liberal racism at its best.
We have reached the pathetic point when liberal hacks pretend to be objective pundits and spew the most insulting brands of biased and slanted observations fashioned as news. We have sunk to the point where we need wonder and worry if enough Americans will be stupid enough to buy the fertilizer that places like CNN, CBS and MSNBC sell as objective reporting.
As we approach the most important election in American history, we must wear the highest boots possible to wade through the slime that is mainstream media today.
© Gabriel Garnica
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
