Michael Gaynor
Character, Cain, Obama, and polygraphs
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Michael Gaynor
November 9, 2011

I do not know whether Bialek's lawyer, Gloria Allred, had her pass a polygraph test before going public with her story, but if Cain wants to put this matter behind him and put the focus on his ideas and Obama's character and record, he should seriously consider taking a polygraph test administered by a generally respected expert without a political agenda. That would give voters the assurance many of them need that the accusation is untrue and he can deal with a crisis effectively.

Presidential candidates need to eliminate doubts about their character.

The current crop of Republican presidential hopefuls need to realize that BOTH Obama's character and THEIR characters are legitimate matters for voters to consider.

John McCain made the serious mistake of treating Obama as a man of good character ("a fine young man"). He took senatorial courtesy much too far, and lost.

The truth matters most to many voters and me, not senatorial courtesy, and I want a President who is a person of honor and honesty.

On November 8, 2011, Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek told ABC's George Stephanopoulos that Cain is not fit to be President until he tells the truth.

I don't know whether her or the anonymous accusations against Cain are true.

I do agree with the general propositions that (1) liars are not fit to be President, regardless of race, color, creed, national origin or sex, and (2) the liberal media treated blacks differently, depending upon their political views, targeting black conservatives and helping black "liberals."

The liberal media establishment's double standard is glaring.

In 2008 the liberal media establishment shamelessly promoted the Obama presidential campaign. Instead of scrutinizing Obama, it whitewashed him.

Obama lied about his relationships with ACORN and such persons as Bill "domestic terrorist" Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah "God damn America" Wright.

The truth is damning, so Obama and his media allies dammed it up, permitting him to be elected President.

Obama's incredible "I didn't know that then" explanations were accepted as true, because it was what the liberal media establishment wanted to do.

In October 2008 The New York Times even spiked a potentially game-changing expose on the illicit relationship between the Obama presidential campaign and ACORN/Project Vote.

The Times motto is "All the news that's fit to print," but its policy is to print what suits its own agenda.

When it comes to black conservatives, the liberal media establishment gives credence to even bogus, obviously politically timed accusations.

The case of Justice Clarence Thomas is Exhibit A.

Conservatives dearly wish that the case of Herman Cain is Exhibit B and the stories of two anonymous accusers seemed to most of us to be politically motivated to sully Cain.

But Justice Thomas's innocence does not make Cain innocent too and Sharon Bialek's story is not another anonymous accusation. Bialek is claiming sexual assault, and that's even worse than sexual harassment. She quotes Cain as having said "You want a job, right?" after she objected to alleged uninvited and unwanted physical contact, suggesting that Cain deemed it appropriate to trade help finding a job for sexual favors. Bialek did not contact the police about the alleged incident, but two of her friends have executed affidavits asserting that she contemporaneously told them about the alleged incident in general terms.

Cain has denied that he ever sexually assaulted or harassed anyone, but doubts about his character have been raised and he should allay them if possible.

Bialek should be investigated to ascertain her credibility.

I do not know whether Bialek's lawyer, Gloria Allred, had her pass a polygraph test before going public with her story, but if Cain wants to put this matter behind him and put the focus on his ideas and Obama's character and record, he should seriously consider taking a polygraph test administered by a generally respected expert without a political agenda. That would give voters the assurance many of them need that the accusation is untrue and he can deal with a crisis effectively.

© Michael Gaynor

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Michael Gaynor

Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Michael Gaynor: Click here

More by this author

July 9, 2018
Librarian of Congress and Federal Court should respect America's Declaration of Independence as approved by Congress, instead of a revision de-emphasizing the importance of God


June 27, 2018
SCOTUS holds Trump travel ban to be constitutional; anti-Trumpers outraged


June 23, 2018
Would Cardinal McCarrick have followed canon law on distributing Holy Communion if he had not been a sexual abuser?


June 19, 2018
Should child neglect be overlooked when children are used as shields by parents entering the United States illegally?


June 6, 2018
The Constitution does not limit the presidential pardon power except in case of impeachment


May 7, 2018
President Trump, please turn the tables on Special Counsel Mueller by challenging him to subpoena you instead of letting him interview you


March 26, 2018
President Trump's choice of John Bolton as National Security Adviser is an unmistakable message to Kim Jung-Un


March 20, 2018
"Fruit of poison tree" protects President Trump as well as you and me


February 6, 2018
Poetic justice: Colluding with the Russians charge boomeranging on Trump persecutors as investigative abuse is uncovered


January 22, 2018
Will the Schumer shutdown lead to nuclear war with North Korea?


More articles