Michael Gaynor
Let's learn from Rush Limbaugh's huge mistake
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Michael Gaynor
March 9, 2012

Let's focus on the real issues instead of wallow too.

Embattled conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh made a huge mistake when he called Georgetown Law Center student Sandra Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute" and muses about her doing sex tapes.

President Obama owes Limbaugh big time, for shifting attention away from what is critically important — religious liberty and conscience protection — to a distraction like Fluke.

Fluke, 30, a Protestant who chose to attend Georgetown University, a Catholic institution established in 1789, wants George University to provide contraception insurance coverage for her, notwithstanding its religious-based objection to doing so.

Last month Fluke spoke before the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee on contraception.

Limbaugh foolishly extended Fluke's 15 minutes of fame by calling Fluke a "slut" and a "prostitute" and suggesting that if she wanted contraception insurance she should post sex tapes in return.

It was unreal and unhelpful.

A firestorm predictably ensued, and Limbaugh lost advertisers, both before and after he apologized.

Limbaugh's apology did not satisfy either Fluke or Imus In The Morning host Don Imus.

Imus expressed anger over Limbaugh's website apology.

"A lame apology on his website, in which he says he didn't mean to personally attack her," Imus said, "is gutless."

Imus, who himself lost his job, even though he quickly apologized for referring to female college basketball players as "nappy headed hoes," blasted Limbaugh's "sustained, vile, personal attack" on Fluke over three days and opined that to apologize, you have to "go sit down with her" and apologize.

It's been terrible, but perhaps some conservatives who think that the proper response to Leftist excess is to use outrageous Alinskyite tactics themselves will realize that is not only wrong, but counterproductive.

Limbaugh later told his listeners, "I do not think she is either of those two words. I did not think last week that she is either of those two words. The apology to her over the weekend was sincere."

Taking Limbaugh at his word that he did not actually believe Fluke was a "slut" or a "prostitute," the question that needs to be answered is, why did he used those words.

Limbaugh explained that he stooped to the level of the liberal opposition who, he says, "will do and say anything to push their agenda."

"This is the mistake I made: In fighting them on this issue last week, I became like them," Limbaugh said. "Against my own instincts, against my own knowledge, against everything I know to be right and wrong, I descended to their level when I used those two words to describe Sandra Fluke. That was my error."

Stated otherwise, Limbaugh used outrageous Alinskyite tactics.

For Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, demonizing the opposition is key, ridicule is a favorite weapon and truth is unimportant.

Alinsky believed that ridicule is man's most potent weapon and a tactic that your people enjoy is a good tactic.

Instead of simply saying that Fluke is a distraction from the real issues — religious liberty and conscience protection, Limbaugh made Fluke's sex life and desire to have contraception covered by her insurance policy (regardless of the tenets of the Catholic Church) the focus of the news and himself an easy target for his political enemies.

The late Andrew Breitbart, a liberal turned conservative and self-described secularist, enthusiastically advocated the use by the Right of the tactics of the Far Left's Saul Alinsky.

It is a fundamentally flawed strategy, as Limbaugh's experience with Fluke shows.

In ridiculing Fluke, perhaps Limbaugh was emulating Breitbart "[a]gainst [his] own instincts, against [his] own knowledge, against everything [he] know[s] to be right and wrong."

Limbaugh should have gone with his own instincts, knowledge and understanding of right and wrong.

Let's focus on the real issues instead of wallow too.

© Michael Gaynor

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Michael Gaynor

Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Michael Gaynor: Click here

More by this author

September 6, 2018
Senator Leahy owes apologies to Judge Kavanaugh and Manuel Miranda for impugning their integrity


August 13, 2018
Will President Trump stand up for the original Declaration of Independence or kneel to the de-emphasis of God in the Library of Congress's revision of it?


July 9, 2018
Librarian of Congress and Federal Court should respect America's Declaration of Independence as approved by Congress, instead of a revision de-emphasizing the importance of God


June 27, 2018
SCOTUS holds Trump travel ban to be constitutional; anti-Trumpers outraged


June 23, 2018
Would Cardinal McCarrick have followed canon law on distributing Holy Communion if he had not been a sexual abuser?


June 19, 2018
Should child neglect be overlooked when children are used as shields by parents entering the United States illegally?


June 6, 2018
The Constitution does not limit the presidential pardon power except in case of impeachment


May 7, 2018
President Trump, please turn the tables on Special Counsel Mueller by challenging him to subpoena you instead of letting him interview you


March 26, 2018
President Trump's choice of John Bolton as National Security Adviser is an unmistakable message to Kim Jung-Un


March 20, 2018
"Fruit of poison tree" protects President Trump as well as you and me


More articles