Kaye Grogan
Please God . . . rescue us from a one-world order inclusion
By Kaye Grogan
If the combining of nations to form a one-world order is going to force or mandate a one-world religion, we need to bow out pronto with a "thanks but no thanks" refusal.
I shudder to think what the one-world order religion is going to be. And to make it more precise — I shudder to think what the consequences are going to be to those, who will adamantly refuse to denounce God. Yes, I'm talking about the God this nation was founded on! I bet you folks thought our government was just being accommodating, and perhaps they were at the time, when they foolishly agreed to tell all foreigners "to come on over!" Maybe it's time to go back and do a little research on who came up with the brilliant . . . but not so brilliant long term decision, to allow people of other cultures to come over and challenge the American traditional values — which would be grounds to be executed or thrown out of foreign countries — if the roles were reversed. Many see this as the first step for forming a one-world order using America as the pasty.
While my husband was serving in the military as an Airman Police officer, he was told by his "superiors" that he was to respect the cultures of the foreign countries he would be assigned to. Now here is what I am getting at: before anyone can become a legal citizen of the United States there needs to be a "clause" in the oath or document stipulating that they will either denounce their own country, and become loyal to America — or at the very least not infringe upon or expect the American culture to conform to their religious beliefs or the cultures of their country. This would tie the hands of groups fighting to ignore or totally abolish the rights — especially the religious rights of Americans favoring the cultures of other countries above those in America.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is encouraging through their undaunted drive, to force Americans to give up their religious rights to appease the religious rights of foreigners. The ACLU should change their organizational title to emphasize what they really stand for. How about: "Against Christians Living Under-God?" Yeah, that sounds more in line with their agenda.
Let's look at how one foreign country views their country's loyalty. Did you know that the Filipino youth have to recite their native pledge every morning before starting class? Only in their pledge, they are ordered . . . yes, ordered to swear to obey and uphold the laws by being good citizens, and to love all Filipinos. I must "commend" the leaders of the Philippines for trying to build "patriotism " and instill allegiance to the country in their youth. Our allegiance practice here in America is on very "shaky" ground . . . to say the least. In fact, if the shaky ground could be registered on a Richter scale — it would be equivalent beyond the "magnitude" of all prior earthquakes.
Boy, I would love to see how far groups similar to the ACLU would last in that country! I bet they would last about as long as an ice cube in Hell. Yeah, they would be melted away in about two seconds flat!
If the real truth is revealed, the "microscopic " part of the truth (we're talking about here) . . . probably centers around completely disarming the people, replacing their arms with invisible shackles, so they can be controlled robots to be programmed accordingly. In other words, the one-world order is more than likely a conspiracy to weaken the power in America, and fulfill the combined scheme to take Americans hostage.
The weakening of the power in America part of my theory is coming to fruition. The economy is a perfect example. Take away or ban all charge cards, and the economy would hit rock bottom immediately.
Whether you agree or not — is immaterial, because history has outlined the "indisputable" facts how the erosion of the morals in society which most consider to be the main infrastructure that keeps a country great and prosperous, met with destruction down through the ages.
While the morals in America are at an all time low — believe it or not, there are many countries below us in the gutter, and if these countries are included in the one-world order fiasco — well, you know what they say about being around bad influences — they tend to rub off on others. And God knows we don't need any more help on moral corruption by combining nations worse off than we are morally.
If you study the botched up state of the United Nations due to corruption, there is no way anyone can argue convincingly . . . a one-world order is viable or a "league of nations" is good for the world. The United Nations cannot promote "unification" when the representatives from the participating countries wouldn't know harmony and peace if it knocked the wind out of them. The majority in the U.N. only tolerate the participation of the United States, because we lead the way in "stupidity" for doling out stockpiles of money, every time a foreign country supposedly needs help.
Yeah . . . I guess they do need help to build up their war arsenals. And if we're going to be blown off of the map — we might as well pay for the best weapons money can buy.
After all — weapons of mass destruction (WMD's) found so far, are cheap and outdated.
As the super power of the world . . . don't we deserve the best of everything?
And that's just my opinion!
© Kaye Grogan
If the combining of nations to form a one-world order is going to force or mandate a one-world religion, we need to bow out pronto with a "thanks but no thanks" refusal.
I shudder to think what the one-world order religion is going to be. And to make it more precise — I shudder to think what the consequences are going to be to those, who will adamantly refuse to denounce God. Yes, I'm talking about the God this nation was founded on! I bet you folks thought our government was just being accommodating, and perhaps they were at the time, when they foolishly agreed to tell all foreigners "to come on over!" Maybe it's time to go back and do a little research on who came up with the brilliant . . . but not so brilliant long term decision, to allow people of other cultures to come over and challenge the American traditional values — which would be grounds to be executed or thrown out of foreign countries — if the roles were reversed. Many see this as the first step for forming a one-world order using America as the pasty.
While my husband was serving in the military as an Airman Police officer, he was told by his "superiors" that he was to respect the cultures of the foreign countries he would be assigned to. Now here is what I am getting at: before anyone can become a legal citizen of the United States there needs to be a "clause" in the oath or document stipulating that they will either denounce their own country, and become loyal to America — or at the very least not infringe upon or expect the American culture to conform to their religious beliefs or the cultures of their country. This would tie the hands of groups fighting to ignore or totally abolish the rights — especially the religious rights of Americans favoring the cultures of other countries above those in America.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is encouraging through their undaunted drive, to force Americans to give up their religious rights to appease the religious rights of foreigners. The ACLU should change their organizational title to emphasize what they really stand for. How about: "Against Christians Living Under-God?" Yeah, that sounds more in line with their agenda.
Let's look at how one foreign country views their country's loyalty. Did you know that the Filipino youth have to recite their native pledge every morning before starting class? Only in their pledge, they are ordered . . . yes, ordered to swear to obey and uphold the laws by being good citizens, and to love all Filipinos. I must "commend" the leaders of the Philippines for trying to build "patriotism " and instill allegiance to the country in their youth. Our allegiance practice here in America is on very "shaky" ground . . . to say the least. In fact, if the shaky ground could be registered on a Richter scale — it would be equivalent beyond the "magnitude" of all prior earthquakes.
Boy, I would love to see how far groups similar to the ACLU would last in that country! I bet they would last about as long as an ice cube in Hell. Yeah, they would be melted away in about two seconds flat!
If the real truth is revealed, the "microscopic " part of the truth (we're talking about here) . . . probably centers around completely disarming the people, replacing their arms with invisible shackles, so they can be controlled robots to be programmed accordingly. In other words, the one-world order is more than likely a conspiracy to weaken the power in America, and fulfill the combined scheme to take Americans hostage.
The weakening of the power in America part of my theory is coming to fruition. The economy is a perfect example. Take away or ban all charge cards, and the economy would hit rock bottom immediately.
Whether you agree or not — is immaterial, because history has outlined the "indisputable" facts how the erosion of the morals in society which most consider to be the main infrastructure that keeps a country great and prosperous, met with destruction down through the ages.
While the morals in America are at an all time low — believe it or not, there are many countries below us in the gutter, and if these countries are included in the one-world order fiasco — well, you know what they say about being around bad influences — they tend to rub off on others. And God knows we don't need any more help on moral corruption by combining nations worse off than we are morally.
If you study the botched up state of the United Nations due to corruption, there is no way anyone can argue convincingly . . . a one-world order is viable or a "league of nations" is good for the world. The United Nations cannot promote "unification" when the representatives from the participating countries wouldn't know harmony and peace if it knocked the wind out of them. The majority in the U.N. only tolerate the participation of the United States, because we lead the way in "stupidity" for doling out stockpiles of money, every time a foreign country supposedly needs help.
Yeah . . . I guess they do need help to build up their war arsenals. And if we're going to be blown off of the map — we might as well pay for the best weapons money can buy.
After all — weapons of mass destruction (WMD's) found so far, are cheap and outdated.
As the super power of the world . . . don't we deserve the best of everything?
And that's just my opinion!
© Kaye Grogan
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
