David Hines
Reform and function
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By David Hines
July 31, 2012

Many people think that some straightforward reform will solve government's problems. As sympathetic as I am to such a desire, it is an illusion. Ain't gonna happen — and if it did the results would not be as expected.

Reform efforts often center on eliminating somebody's input from politics. Some would silence corporations; others would stifle unions. McCain and Feingold went after nearly everyone but professional politicians. Let's recognize the unspoken but obvious component. The advocate is saying, "Censor those who don't agree with me, then everything will be fine."

But laws and regulations are ubiquitous. They affect nearly everybody. In a democratic republic, some are telling fellow citizens, "Shut up and obey!" The advocate may not know a thing about the business being affected, but would issue the orders nevertheless. Would we want a nuclear reactor run without any input from nuclear engineers? There could likewise be adverse effects from reform programs, with less radioactive but still deleterious results.

Some would-be reformers argue for technocracy. They believe that if government were put on autopilot, all would be well. This posits robotic bureaucrats with no personal agenda. It removes democratic input, and trusts in those deemed (by whom?) to be "experts." The "experts" become a law unto themselves, with great power to enact their personal agendas.

But what of their purported expertise? Might that take us down the garden path? Recall, no less an "expert" than Ben Bernanke said the housing sector was fine — a mere month before the crash. Several years ago, "expert" federal forest rangers in Colorado set a controlled burn despite high wind warnings; they set much of the state ablaze. FEMA "experts" managed efforts after Hurricane Katrina, to the disgruntlement of many.

Who controls government? There is a fantasy that "we the people" do. But when was the last time you could get a private meeting with your elected federal official? If you bundled six figures in campaign contributions, you stand a good chance. Otherwise, you are on the outside lookin' in. Even wives of lobbyists, bureaucrats, and politicians have more input than you do; they hobnob with those making the decisions. The way their daily contacts see the world becomes the norm for officials within the circles of power — not the way you and I see it, no matter what they tell you at election time. Getting the money out of the process won't gain average people any more influence.

So long as there is money and advantage to be gained through government — as well as myriad constraints, taxes, and mandates applying to those with no voice in DC — there will be people seeking to influence. Real reform reduces government to its Constitutional minimum. With little lucre to be gained, the incentive to influence disappears. Government could then concentrate on its tasks assigned by the document, undistracted by the rent seekers.

Does such a reform stand a better chance than any other? A little — not because the rent seekers can be controlled, but because it may be forced upon us as the corrupt and bankrupt system breaks down. We shan't have much choice. We can choose the reform, or have it thrust upon us by events. At this time, most people are opting for the latter. Even worse, some are choosing more totalitarian approaches, hoping to stave off the day of reckoning a little while longer.

Many reform efforts seek to keep the reformers' preferred dysfunctions in place. This is an ad hoc approach, not a holistic one. It dooms the reform to its own dysfunction.

© David Hines

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

David Hines

Born in a mill town, David Hines has seen work as a furniture mover, computer programmer/analyst, and professional musician... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by David Hines: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
Saving America by saving Ukraine

Jerry Newcombe
Cancelling the “most wonderful time of the year?”

Judi Caler
Bluffing their way to an Article V Convention

Paul Cameron
The Marriage Equality Act in light of gay sex rings and molestations in group homes

Michael Bresciani
Why Libs, Dems, LGBT and Trans activists can’t identify the source of their own deep confusion

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Rev. Mark Creech issues statement on Senate passage of ‘Respect for Marriage Act’

Tom DeWeese
What we can learn from a red tide

Selwyn Duke
The new voting system that gave Dems a GOP House seat is dangerous. Here’s why.

Pete Riehm
Wiping out an entire generation of American youth

Peter Lemiska
How can woke warriors command an unsurpassed fighting force?

Tom DeWeese
Where have all the flowers gone? Long time passing.

Cliff Kincaid
How Trump saved the world
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites