Sharon Hughes
May 24, 2007
Pork has no place in funding the war
By Sharon Hughes

While most of the media attention about the various Iraq-war funding bills has been focused on the battle between the Democrat-led Congress and President Bush on a time-table for troop withdrawal, more attention needs to be given to the 'pork' that has been added to the Democrat-sponsored bills, 'pork' the White House calls, "excessive and extraneous non-emergency spending."

Pork for items such as:

    -Billions of dollars in domestic spending for farm drought relief, medical coverage for poor children and hurricane recovery

    -Projects on the reconstruction of New Orleans levees and peanut storehouses in Georgia

    -$25 million for spinach growers hit by last year's E. coli scare

    -$500 million for wildfire prevention for the West Coast

    -$120 million for shrimp and Atlantic menhaden fishermen

    -$15 million to prevent salt water 'intrusion' on Louisiana rice fields

And there's more as the NY Times Caucus Blog lists:

    -$3 million for funding a sugar cane Hawaiian co-op

    -$24 million for funding for sugar beets

    -$2 million to the University of Vermont Education Excellence Program

    -$25 million for the Safe and Drug Free Schools program

    -$48 million for disaster reconstruction for NASA

    -$13 million for mine safety research

    -$25 million for asbestos abatement and tunnel repair at the Capitol Power Plant

    -$640 million for LIHEAP

    -$13.2 million for avian flu research and monitoring

    -$3.5 million related to guided tours of the U.S. Capitol

    -$22.8 million for geothermal research and development

    -$12 million for forest service money (requested by the president in the non-emergency FY2008 budget)

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that this amounts to the Democrats trying to buy votes. Plain and simple. Even trying to buy the President's vote with the last one listed. But it's not working.

Here's an example that the Washington Post points out: "For more than a year, Rep. Charles Boustany Jr. (R) has tried unsuccessfully to secure federal funds to prevent salt water from intruding on rice fields in his lowland Louisiana district. So it came as a surprise last week when Boustany found $15 million in the House's huge war spending bill for his rice farmers. He hadn't even asked that the bill include it."

Fortunately Boustany is not buying it. He said, "It gives me no satisfaction to vote against measures that I have been working for since even before [Hurricane] Katrina, but I cannot in good conscience vote for a bill that does this to our troops," Boustany said yesterday, decrying what he called the "cheap politics" of using disaster aid to win votes on a measure this controversial."

Isn't it interesting that Nancy Pelosi said in response to the President's refusal to sign the last version of the bill, "It is clear that the difference between the Democrats and the president is the issue of accountability. He will not accept any accountability or responsibility for what is happening (in Iraq)."

Ooops.

Is filling the bill with pork to get votes being responsible...and accountable?

John Bolten, former Ambassador to the UN, said the Democrats have made it impossible for the president to sign the bill because of insisting on a timetable for troop withdrawal. "Whether waiveable or not, timelines send exactly the wrong signal to our adversaries, to our allies and, most importantly, to the troops in the field."

Again, the Washington Post reported, "Republicans say the Democrats' failure to pass a "clean'' funding bill without any conditions has hurt military operations around the world by requiring Pentagon planners to juggle money among accounts. Democrats say there is enough money to fund Iraq operations into July — more than enough time for the deadlock to be resolved."

I say, forget the strong-arming troop-withdrawal requirements, cut the pork, and fund our soldiers!

Congress can come up with other bills for the 'pork' items and even on a time-table for troop withdrawal, but let's stop the 'unaccountable' antics of loading a much needed funding bill, now.

© Sharon Hughes

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Sharon Hughes

Sharon Hughes is Founder and President of The Center for Changing Worldviews and the host of Changing Worldviews & WOMANTalk radio on KDIA in San Francisco, NPLR and online at Salem Web Network’s Oneplace.com. Her articles appear in many recognized news sites and publications, including FRONTPAGEMAG. She also blogs for NewsBusters.org, a division of The Media Research Center, and has appeared on FOX News and other national radio programs.

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Sharon Hughes: Click here

Latest articles

 

Alan Keyes
Why de facto government (tyranny) is replacing the Constitution

Stephen Stone
Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress?

Wes Vernon
Did lawmaker hand Rush the cat out of the bag?

Cliff Kincaid
Sanders adviser says repeal Columbus Day

Matt C. Abbott
Priest-theologian: if worst-case scenario at synod occurs, Catholics must resist changes

Bryan Fischer
Finding a wife - Boy to Man Book, Chapter 17

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Marriage, a wolf, and Little Red Riding Hood

Kevin Price
Big business and its love affair with minimum wage

Judie Brown
The Good Shepherd, Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted

Rev. Austin Miles
BREAKING! U.N. dictates global sodomite acceptance

Ellis Washington
Adolf Hitler: The Early War Years (1939-42)

A.J. Castellitto
Carry thy gun, love thy neighbor

Selwyn Duke
What really drives Obama's destructive mideast policy?

James Lambert
Barack Hussein Obama has no interest in upholding laws he does not like
  More columns

Cartoons


Michael Ramirez
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites