Warner Todd Huston
April 1, 2011
Wisconsin union's boycott likely illegal
By Warner Todd Huston

Government union members of AFSCME Council 24 are circulating letters to local businesses in southeast Wisconsin threatening them that if they don't come to immediate and vocal support of government unions the businesses will be targeted for attack.

The union says it won't be satisfied with statements of neutrality, either. An AFSCME spokesman told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that only full-throated support would keep the union from attacking businesses.

The union told businesses that if they didn't put a sign in their store windows proclaiming their support of government unions, then the union would target the business. "Failure to do so will leave us no choice but (to) do a public boycott of your business. And sorry, neutral means 'no' to those who work for the largest employer in the area and are union members," the union said in its letter.

As Brett Jacobson quips, "Translation: That's a nice business you got there. It would be a shame if something happened to it."

But all this sounds suspiciously like a violation of Wisconsin State law:

    943.30 Threats to injure or accuse of crime. (1) Whoever, either verbally or by any written or printed communication, maliciously threatens to accuse or accuses another of any crime or offense, or threatens or commits any injury to the person, property, business, profession, calling or trade, or the profits and income of any business, profession, calling or trade of another, with intent thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatever, or with intent to compel the person so threatened to do any act against the person's will or omit to do any lawful act, is guilty of a Class H felony.

    943.31 Threats to communicate derogatory information. Whoever threatens to communicate to anyone information, whether true or false, which would injure the reputation of the threatened person or another unless the threatened person transfers property to a person known not to be entitled to it is guilty of a Class I felony.

    History: 1977 c. 173; 2001 a. 109.

    A threat to injure a manager's reputation unless a job is offered violated this section. State v. Gilkes, 118 Wis. 2d 149, 345 N.W.2d 531 (Ct. App. 1984).

    History: 1977 c. 173; 2001 a. 109.

Or this statute:

    134.01 Injury to business; restraint of will. Any 2 or more persons who shall combine, associate, agree, mutually undertake or concert together for the purpose of willfully or maliciously injuring another in his or her reputation, trade, business or profession by any means whatever, or for the purpose of maliciously compelling another to do or perform any act against his or her will, or preventing or hindering another from doing or performing any lawful act shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not more than one year or by fine not exceeding $500.

(H/T Da Tech Guy)

© Warner Todd Huston

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)


Warner Todd Huston

Warner Todd Huston's thoughtful commentary, sometimes irreverent often historically based, is featured on many websites... (more)

Latest articles

 

Alan Keyes
Why de facto government (tyranny) is replacing the Constitution (Apr. 2015)

Stephen Stone
Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress? (Nov. 2014)

Laurie Roth
Americans run back to God now

Chip McLean
The end of the Wicked Witch of the Left?

Clenard Childress
Black Life Matters collaborates with Planned Parenthood

Tim Dunkin
The United States need a Brexit strategy

Tabitha Korol
Musings of a Muslim father

Curtis Dahlgren
31 genders and becoming Venezuela: Signs of decline (by design)

Judie Brown
Alleviating Catholic madness

Rev. Austin Miles
MilesTones: Yes you're the man--OOPS--a forbidden word !

Michael Gaynor
Donald Trump must continue to counterattack liberal media bias, not ignore it

Alan Keyes
Having no choice means bearing no responsibility

Selwyn Duke
"Sexism" at the Olympics? How's this: Why do women's sports even exist?

J. Matt Barber
Still 'pro-choice' after this? Then you have no soul
  More columns

Cartoons


Michael Ramirez
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites