Henry Lamb
Occupiers or tea partiers?
By Henry Lamb
February 12, 2012

To listen click here

Imagine how the media would react were the Tea Parties to behave as the Occupiers have. Take a few minutes to view some of this video (2:09), or this video (2:08). Occupiers demand to "occupy" whatever they wish as a First Amendment right, but they will not allow Tea Party people (:52- explicit) to exercise their First Amendment rights.

Take a look at this video (1:20). The difference between the two groups is quite dramatic. Now see what happens when Occupiers are challenged by Tea Party people (4:02). Occupiers seem to believe that someone, perhaps the rich or the government, owes them something.

The Occupier in this video (1:42) says that all Senators, present and past, are a part of the one-percent who own 40-percent of the nation's wealth. He asks how this happened, and says that non-violence is not the answer. He says that ultimately, the rich will not go without a violent revolution.

Occupiers seem to believe that someone owes them a job and a livable income, and a home, at least, and perhaps more. These ideas are consistent with Marx and Engels' 19th century thinking, but have consistently failed every society that has tried to live by them. Nevertheless, a consistent theme at all Occupy sites is "down with capitalism," and "up with socialism."

Tea Partiers, on the other hand, expect nothing from their fellow citizens; and from government, they expect to be protected from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution. As the Declaration of Independence declares that all people are:
    "...endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
Throughout all of nature, all of God's creatures are endowed with these same rights; nothing more. Why do Socialists, and Occupiers, think they are entitled to anything else?

Occupiers move into an area where they claim to have a right to pitch tents, pile up their sleeping gear, have sex and drug parties, without any regard for the law that prohibits camping, and no respect for other people who have exactly the same right to access the space they occupy. Rep. Maxine Waters embraces this activity, while holding a completely different view of the Tea Parties.

Why are the Tea Party people not camping out in public spaces, breaking windows, spray-painting vulgar graffiti on other people's property, and burning the American flag?

Tea Party people love America, respect the U.S. Constitution, and the rule of law. Tea Party people want to change the law at the ballot box, not by intimidation and violence. From the interviews that appear on television, Occupiers have no idea what their policy goals are. When asked by the media, the more articulate occupiers mumble something about one-percenters and the "rich." In contrast, every Tea Partier agrees that the size and power of the federal government must be reduced; the tax system must be reformed; and the rapidly-growing $15 trillion national debt must be eliminated, and a balanced budget Amendment must be adopted.

To achieve their goals, Tea Party people are not creating havoc in the streets in hopes of getting the media to focus on what they claim is "police brutality." Tea Partiers are conducting thousands of meetings in local communities across the county. They are learning about policy options and political procedures. Tea Party people are attending meetings of their city councils and county commissions. They are getting acquainted with their local political leaders. They are teaching their political leaders and their elected officials about the dangers of implementing policies that infringe or destroy private property rights in the name of "sustainable development."

Tea Party people are identifying new candidates and helping prepare to replace elected officials who share the Occupiers' belief that the "rich" and government owe them a living. The mid-term election in 2010 is a preview of the effectiveness of the Tea Party's strategy. Tea Party people, and the 9.12 groups, are discovering and working with local groups that promote property rights, tax reform, the 2nd Amendment, and a host of other Constitutional issues.

This naturally occurring coalition has become The Freedom Movement. With increasing frequency, these groups are exchanging information and coordinating activities that tend to multiply their effectiveness.

The elections on November 6, 2012 will determine whether America chooses to follow the Occupiers, embraced by the Democrats, led by President Obama, or reject President Obama- and restore the U.S. Constitution to its rightful place of respect, and return America to the land of the free, as envisioned by our Founders.

© Henry Lamb


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)


Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Jerry Newcombe
A politically-incorrect prayer

Victor Sharpe
Who truly deserves a state? The Kurds or the Palestinians?

Pete Riehm
Father's Day: When men sing!

Cherie Zaslawsky
RFK Jr.: The silver-tongued spoiler

Randy Engel
A documentary: Opus Dei and the Knights of Columbus – The anatomy of a takeover bid, Part VIII

Linda Goudsmit
CHAPTER 22: What Is Social Justice?

Stephen Stone
A Song for Independence Day: ‘Have You Been To My Hometown?’

Rev. Mark H. Creech
From ancient idols to modern misconceptions: The call to worship only God

Michael Bresciani
Pride Month – Are we proud of the decimation, disfigurement, and death of children?

Tom DeWeese
The second great Colorado land grab

Matt C. Abbott
Dealing with the Dobbs backlash

Ronald R. Cherry
Book Review: Left Imperialism – From Cardinal Richelieu to Klaus Schwab, by Gary Gindler
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites