Darla Meyers
God's "wanted for murder" poster- -you?
By Darla Meyers
Look in the mirror. Do you see a murderer? Do you see an accessory to murder? Could you kill a defenseless child who can't even scream for help?
As proof of how desensitized this country has become to killing small, voiceless children, a sickening question must be asked: What's a more gruesome way to be murdered? Partial-birth infanticide or human embryonic infanticide? If you answered "partial-birth infanticide," the heinous murder of a child by sticking a large needle into the back of its still breathing head to kill it, you're wrong. There is no difference between having a needle puncture the back of a baby's head to kill it or to have a needle skewer a small child to disembowel it.
And yet, many Republicans claim that McCain is the lesser of three evils. How so? We have a possible "Republican" Presidential candidate publicly state he will force taxpayers to fund the wholesale slaughter of children through human embryonic infanticide. Had we known President Bush would be the first to force taxpayers to fund medical experimentation on already murdered children, "stem cell lines," would we have voted for him? Would we vote for a candidate who said he'd force taxpayers to fund medical experimentation and extermination on already-murdered Jews?
If we could hear the screams of the children being disemboweled by needle, would we vote for the Presidential candidate who says he will force taxpayers to pay for these killings? Time is running out. We're slip-sliding away as a country. Can you hear the screams now?
This November, if McBama is the candidate, I'm writing in God for President, as a reminder of Who will judge on the last day.
© Darla Meyers
Look in the mirror. Do you see a murderer? Do you see an accessory to murder? Could you kill a defenseless child who can't even scream for help?
As proof of how desensitized this country has become to killing small, voiceless children, a sickening question must be asked: What's a more gruesome way to be murdered? Partial-birth infanticide or human embryonic infanticide? If you answered "partial-birth infanticide," the heinous murder of a child by sticking a large needle into the back of its still breathing head to kill it, you're wrong. There is no difference between having a needle puncture the back of a baby's head to kill it or to have a needle skewer a small child to disembowel it.
And yet, many Republicans claim that McCain is the lesser of three evils. How so? We have a possible "Republican" Presidential candidate publicly state he will force taxpayers to fund the wholesale slaughter of children through human embryonic infanticide. Had we known President Bush would be the first to force taxpayers to fund medical experimentation on already murdered children, "stem cell lines," would we have voted for him? Would we vote for a candidate who said he'd force taxpayers to fund medical experimentation and extermination on already-murdered Jews?
If we could hear the screams of the children being disemboweled by needle, would we vote for the Presidential candidate who says he will force taxpayers to pay for these killings? Time is running out. We're slip-sliding away as a country. Can you hear the screams now?
This November, if McBama is the candidate, I'm writing in God for President, as a reminder of Who will judge on the last day.
© Darla Meyers
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)
