Mary Mostert
September 4, 2004
Alan Keyes teaches sex education lesson to homosexual interviewer
By Mary Mostert

Mike Signorile, who says in his bio he co-founded a now-defunct New York City magazine for lesbians and homosexuals, is known for what we might call harassing politicians about sex. He prowled the halls of the 1996 Republican Convention in San Diego, which I attended, pouncing on unsuspecting delegates about sex. It appears that at the Republican Convention in New York, he finally pounced on someone who pounced back when he went after Alan Keyes, Illinois Republican candidate for the US Senate.

Signorile's first sentence was: "I am speaking with Alan Keyes and you've come to the Republican convention to support President Bush, I presume?"

Alan Keyes responded: "Certainly. I think that President Bush needs to be reelected for the sake of this country's security. He has provided the kind of leadership that we're going to have to have if we're going to confront and defeat the challenge of terrorism that has already claimed so many American lives."

Signorile's second sentence was: "What did you think of Vice President Cheney last week coming out and saying he doesn't agree with the President on the Federal Marriage Amendment? Seems to be a break with the party. Do you think he is sending a mixed signal?"

Alan Keyes, amiably replied: "I don't know. I think he is entitled to his personal convictions, but I think that the party's position is the correct one. We have to stand in defense of the traditional marriage institution in order to preserve its basis in procreation and make sure that we retain an understanding of family life that is rooted in the tradition of procreation, of childbearing and childrearing. That is the essence of family life."

And then Signorile attacked with: "Now, Vice President Cheney, of course, has a daughter. She is gay. He used the word gay. He says he has a gay daughter. He seems very proud of his gay daughter. It seems like real family values and certainly seems like preserving the American family. Is his family un-American?"

That wasn't a very smart move on Signorile's part. The next part of the interview went as follows:

    Alan Keyes: "No, the point of the matter is that marriage, as an institution, involves procreation. It is in principle impossible for homosexuals to procreate. Therefore, they cannot marry. It is a simple logical syllogism, and one can wish all one might, but pigs don't fly and we can't change the course of nature."

    Mike Signorile: "Well, one can wish that Bob and Liddy Dole would have a child, but that's just impossible. Pigs can't fly.

    Alan Keyes: "No, I'm sorry, that is incidental. In point of fact, Bob and Liddy Dole can have children. They incidentally face problems that prevent them from doing so. In principle . . ."

    Mike Signorile: "Don't homosexuals incidentally face problems too?"

    Alan Keyes: "No, you don't understand the difference between incident and essence. Homosexuals are essentially incapable of procreation. They cannot mate. They are not made to do so. Therefore the idea of marriage for two such individuals is an absurdity."

    Mike Signorile: "But one or the other in the couple can procreate. The men can donate their sperm, the women can have babies."

    Alan Keyes: "The definition and understanding of marriage is 'the two become one flesh.' In the child, the two transcend their persons and unite together to become a new individual. That can only be done through procreation and conception. It cannot be done by homosexuals."

    Mike Signorile: "But what about a heterosexual couple who cannot bear children and then adopt? They are not becoming one as flesh, they are taking someone else's flesh."

    Alan Keyes: "And they are adopting the paradigm of family life. But the essence of that family life remains procreation. If we embrace homosexuality as a proper basis for marriage, we are saying that it is possible to have a marriage state that in principle excludes procreation and is based simply on the premise of selfish hedonism. This is unacceptable."

    Mike Signorile: "So Mary Cheney is a selfish hedonist, is that it?"

    Alan Keyes: "Of course she is. That goes by definition. Of course she is."

    Mike Signorile: "I don't think Dick Cheney would like to hear that about his daughter."

    Alan Keyes: "He may or may not like to hear the truth, but it can be spoken."

    [UNIDENTIFIED VOICE]: "Do you really believe that, that Mary Cheney . . ."

    Alan Keyes: "By definition, a homosexual engages in the exchange of mutual pleasure. I actually object to the notion that we call it sexual relations because it's nothing of the kind."

    [UNIDENTIFIED VOICE]: "What is it?"

    Alan Keyes: "It is the mutual pursuit of pleasure through the stimulation of the organs intended for procreation, but it has nothing to do with sexuality because they are of the same sex. And with respect to them, the sexual difference does not exist. They are therefore not having sexual relations."

    Mike Signorile: "Mr. Keyes, how can you support President Bush then, because if something were to happen to him, the President would be Dick Cheney, who has a daughter who you say is a hedonist, and a selfish hedonist, and the President would be supporting that at that point?"

    Alan Keyes: "It seems to me that we are supporting a ticket that is committed to the kinds of things that are necessary to defend this country, and we are all united in that support, in spite of what might be differences on issues here and there."

Contrary to the way this has been reported by most news sources, it wasn't Alan Keyes who called Mary Cheney a "selfish hedonist." It wasn't Alan Keyes who brought up the Cheney family and it wasn't Keyes who was trying to create a scene. It was Signorile who brought up the Cheney family and Signorile, the homosexual, who, trying to rattle the unflappable Alan Keyes, said: "So Mary Cheney is a selfish hedonist."

A hedonist is a person whose highest goal in life is pleasure. Not all the selfish hedonists in our culture are homosexuals or lesbians, according to Keyes' clear definition. That definition would also fit heterosexuals who selfishly avoid procreation or whose selfishness leads to divorce.

Keyes' sex education lesson to a confused homosexual ought to be required reading in every sex education class in the country. It might begin scaling back the flood of misery, disease, and early death that await those who choose to get involved in homosexual and lesbian life styles.

Editor's note: An MP3 audio of Alan's comments is available here.

© Mary Mostert

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Mary Mostert

Mary Mostert is a nationally-respected political writer. She was one of the first female political commentators to be published in a major metropolitan newspaper in the 1960s... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Mary Mostert: Click here

Latest articles

September 29, 2010
The consequences of deception


March 17, 2009
Glenn Beck and 21st century version of Founding Fathers' "Committee on Correspondence"


February 27, 2009
Community organizer Obama confronts the power structure


February 17, 2009
Will al-Qaeda trade box cutters they used in 2001 for nuclear missiles in 2009?


January 18, 2009
Terrorism: President Bush's record vs. President Obama's promises


January 4, 2009
The Gaza problem: how do you negotiate with people who want to obliterate you?


December 10, 2008
Obama, Gov. Blagojevitch, Chicago politics, corruption, and change


November 14, 2008
Prop. 8, homosexuals, attacks on LDS churches, freedom, and Gadianton Robbers


November 6, 2008
Comparing acceptance speeches: Adolf Hitler 1933 and Barack Obama 2008


November 1, 2008
The "I'm tired of being called a racist" factor in the 2008 election


More articles