Credit where credit's due

By Johnny D. Symon

I sat through this week's Spanish Congressional cross-talk in Madrid on Spain's economic crisis, taking careful note of the government's proposed "measures," and subsequent careful note of how each respective political party responded. For up until the economic crisis was officially and belatedly recognized by Spain's Banana Republic government, most parties were close allies with the owner-operator of The Moncloa Palace Plantation. This time round though, things were radically different. No party spokesman favored Zapatonto's measures. Everyone rejected his plan.

Confidence in Spain's Communist leader has hit rock bottom, and Zappo resorted to using his old tried and tested formula of blaming his country's ills on outside forces, chiefly Bush and the United States of America. Conservative leader, Mariano Rajoy, made mention of this shortly after Zappo's first speech, or first slavering session, and the truth is that Zappo shares this condition with others, most chiefly Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales.

When push comes to shove the Malign Trinity find themselves back in their own personally crafted "Groundhog Day." For me, watching those three monkeys making speeches is like falling victim to the Chinese water torture; each drop impacts on my head with equal force, and each drop looks the same as the former, but the agony grows on an ever increasing scale. Evo expels the US Ambassador, and Hugo plays guest to two Russian nuclear bombers. Then Zapatonto blames the United States for his country's abysmal economic performance. All in the selfsame week. Which has me wondering where the root of it all began.

I asked myself the following questions; When exactly did the world begin to use America as it's scapegoat, and why have so many common people throughout the world believed the unbelievable? And again, I returned to 1919 and the League of Nations. I regard that time and that losing formula as a major point in respect of mankind's continued fall from grace. The proposal was an attempt to rebuild Babel and usurp the Laws and Judgments of our Creator, through collectively replacing them with man-made concepts; Universal Democracy may be an apt term for them, whereas they're in direct opposition to Universal Theocracy.

The scattering of a collective peoples into separate national entities was performed as a consequence of the attempt to build a tower at Babel. The result was the forming of National Identity and love for one's country, in place of a love for the world. And that's how it should have remained; diverse nations working out their own personal salvation, utilizing those unique and personal gifts that all nations must discover and operate within themselves. Whereas globalism and multiculturalism is at enmity with God.

If, through direct judgment mankind was scattered throughout the earth, and given new languages to speak, other than one common to them all, to prevent mankind from destroying itself, must not a return to the former be a return to certain disaster? Surely the Laws of the wild, that I spoke about in an earlier ed, would be a better course to take. The great Rudyard Kipling offered the following;

"And this is the law of the wild,
as old and as true as the sky.
And the wolf who keeps it will prosper,
but the wolf who breaks it will die!
Like the wind that circles the tree trunk,
this law runneth forward and back.
The strength of the pack is the wolf,
and the strength of the wolf is the pack."

The law of the wild therefore is simple and clear, but we must understand what "pack" means, for if we mistake the world and it's peoples to be "our pack" in place of our allotted and God-given nation, then death will be our chosen portion!

The Russian Conflict Federation has spent many years reasserting it's pack status, while the United States and Europe have busied themselves through diluting and weakening their respective packs.

The responsibility of a US President should be to his own pack, then his own pack will become his strength. That's the law of the wild in action. And because it's not applied, America has become the world's scapegoat.

We've all become drunk under the influence of Universal Democracy in Action, when we ought to sober ourselves up through concentrating our efforts on rebuilding Universal Theocracy within our own nation. I guess we've been fooled into believing the lying rhetoric of globalist-minded varmints that "a particular nation cannot survive and grow of it's own volition," and we've therefore forgotten a universal truth written into the Bible, that a nation can indeed survive, grow, and prosper within itself, so long as it respects and operates Theocratic Laws.

Zapatero this week blamed America for his economic ills. He cited the real estate and credit crisis America faces as the main factor that affects the Spanish economy. And technically he's half right, because Spain is not operating as a unique pack any more than the United States is. Furthermore, the very existence of credit, or more importantly, the perceived need of it in the United States, is evidence of America's shedding of Biblical faith, because Deuteronomy 15 describes credit as "slavery" and proposes a plan of action that would remove credit from the land.

The great Benjamin Franklin was born into poverty, then worked his way up to be one of the greatest names in world history. And something he had written on his parents' gravestone is worthy of note;

"From this instance, reader,
Be encouraged to diligence in thy calling,
And distrust not Providence .."

Benjamin Franklin lived by his own advice. He was diligent to his calling, and fully trusted in God's providence toward him, and I reckon any nation throughout God's earth can live by that advice too. If America as a unique pack became diligent in their calling, and trusted solely in God's providence toward them, their troubles would dissolve and disperse as mist.

"You will extend credit to many nations,
but you will not need any credit for yourselves.
You will thus dominate many nations,
but none will dominate you."
— Deuteronomy 15:6b

Globalism and Universal Democracy condemns any nation which attempts to dominate others, but the above verse contradicts them. Badly run nations of little or no faith always require credit, whereas a soundly run nation of great faith contains a people who are truly free, requiring no credit, for credit is slavery. Therefore a sound nation discovers that it's resources outsource their requirements, and their surplus can be used to contain the excesses of failed democracies, and for me that's a good thing, and Deuteronomy 15 bears me out.

When Deuteronomy 15 proposes credit solely for other nations, it also rejects the notion of writing off of debt. Any nation that receives credit from a righteous nation must pay it back, but nowadays we mistake credit for handouts, and witness national leaders writing off foreign debt, while watching their own countrymen, members of their own pack, going to jail for non-payment. And again, it's the evils of Socio-Democracy in action.

Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales represent Social Democracy in action. Both have orchestrated and propagated poverty and slavery in their own lands. Resultantly, and in accordance with world history, their nations have become feudal and fragmented, and their greatest enemies are within their own borders, something that leaders of this type find hard to come to terms with. So the national instability, and resultant internal hostility, transmutes into a "blame other nations" trip, and again, they're both half right. Hugo, Evo and President G W Bush, have one thing in common; they nationalize companies. That's Socio-Democracy in action. The downside of Deuteronomy 15.

Nationalization is solely a sickness for faithless nations, and again the Bible bears me out. Credit also is the symptom of a greater sickness besetting a nation; the sickness of atheism, and World-loving faithless Democracy.

© Johnny D. Symon