Bryan Fischer
Trump v. Clinton: all you need to know
FacebookTwitter
By Bryan Fischer
May 21, 2016

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"

Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-F www.afr.net

The contest for the presidency is down to two choices: Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.

Conservatives might wish they had more options, but the reality is we don't. In golf we have an expression, "play it as it lies." That means you hit your ball from the spot where it is, not where you wish it was. This, of course, is a rule honored much more in the breach than the observance, as is true with many of the rules of golf.

But nevertheless, it is a rule. As much as you'd like to, when you are playing tournament golf you are not allowed to improve your lie by kicking it out of the rough or from behind a tree.

The rules of politics are much the same. We have to play things as they are, not as we wish they were. Donald Rumsfeld famously said that we have to go to war with the army we have, not the one we wish we had.

Many conservatives – myself included – would have preferred a different candidate other than Donald Trump to carry the Republican banner. But the stubborn reality that everyone must face head on is that we are truly faced with a binary choice. Our next president will either be Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump.

Trump, as readers of my columns well know, is a quite flawed candidate, politically as well as personally. But it is what it is, and the question that must be faced next is a simple one: is there a simple way to distinguish between Trump and Clinton that would shine the light on the electoral path for conservatives? And the answer is yes.

Trump yesterday released a list of 11 judges he would "likely" nominate to the Supreme Court. Of course the word "likely" means that it is certainly possible that this list will become simply a "suggestion" like a number of other Trump campaign promises.

But be that as it may, his list by all accounts is a stellar list. It includes three judges who clerked for Justice Clarence Thomas and two who clerked for Antonin Scalia. While Justice Scalia is literally irreplaceable, judges who share his judicial philosophy are on this list.

Critics may say the chances of anyone of these judges being actually nominated are slim, but what they are conceding is that there is a chance.

That chance does not exist with Hillary Clinton. While Trump has included judges who revere Antonin Scalia, every nominee on Hillary's list will revere Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

One positive implication, that almost no one is talking about, is that the publication of this list will likely stiffen the resolve of the Senate leadership to refuse even a hearing for President Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland. Trump is ensuring that the next president will be the one who nominates Scalia's replacement.

The next president will also likely nominate three additional replacements to the Supreme Court, which means quite simply that the Court will be his legacy. Now the Supreme Court was never intended by either the Founders or the Constitution itself to have the kind of dictatorial and legislative power it has assumed. But until the Republicans develop enough intestinal fortitude to start impeaching renegade judges, we are forced to play it as it lies. The only realistic way to rein in an out-of-control judiciary, other than states ignoring unconstitutional edicts, is through Supreme Court justices who believe in applying the Constitution rather than re-writing it.

Can I give you any assurance that Mr. Trump will actually wind up nominating even a single name on his list? Nope. Nobody can. But I can give you the guarantee that if Hillary Clinton is in charge of nominations whatever chance we have of recapturing our constitutional republic will be gone forever.

Bottom line: the worst judge on Donald Trump's list is far better than the best judge on Hillary Clinton's list. Let the voter beware.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

© Bryan Fischer

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Heavenly hope: What President Trump’s words show us about salvation

Pete Riehm
The common-sense president baffles Democrats

Linda Goudsmit
Whistleblower Dr. Marvin Rapaport exposes political medicine and its elusive 'hidden' allergy

Curtis Dahlgren
The Ides of August again – College orientation week

Linda Kimball
A spiritual brotherhood: Why we must restore and defend the western Christian worldview against the lies of our enemies

Tom DeWeese
Private property rights are the key to freedom

Jerry Newcombe
The Boston Liberty Tree

Pete Riehm
Cultural reversal and media reckoning

Cliff Kincaid
The great conservative hope in Canada

Cliff Kincaid
Can Trump stop Mamdani from becoming NYC mayor? [VIDEO]

Joan Swirsky
Explaining the geyser of Jew hate

Tom DeWeese
Education or brainwashing – your choice (by Tom's associate Kathleen Marquardt)
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites