Bryan Fischer
The Constitution, Luther Strange, and Roy Moore
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Bryan Fischer
September 26, 2017

Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"

Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-F www.afr.net

A valid question for Alabama voters to ask as they go to the polls today is which of the two candidates in the GOP primary, Luther Strange or Roy Moore, is a better friend of the Constitution.

Here is the oath every U.S. senator must take before casting a single vote on legislation (emphasis mine):

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

All a voter has to do to get an answer to the question is to evaluate their respective responses to the egregiously bad Obergefell ruling in which the Supreme Court presumed to issue a diktat to the entire country on sodomy-based marriage.

Strange, as the attorney general of Alabama at the time, did not fight this ruling but instead folded like a cheap Bedouin tent in a stiff desert breeze.

The Constitution Strange took an oath to uphold says unambiguously in Article I that "all legislative power shall be vested in Congress." How much legislative power does that leave to the Supreme Court? Precisely zero.

The Supreme Court has no authority whatsoever to make law. Their rulings are binding on the plaintiffs and defendants before them, as is the case in every courtroom in America. But their rulings have no binding power beyond the parties who appear before them.

Abraham Lincoln understood this, which is why he accepted the Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott as it applied to Scott and his owner. But Lincoln refused to accept that the Scott ruling had any binding precedential impact on the rest of the nation.

Mr. Strange, unfortunately, fell all over himself to declare that Obergefell was "the law of the land," and meekly surrendered the express will of the people of Alabama to their tyrannical, unelected, and unaccountable judicial overlords.

Roy Moore, on the other hand, refused to accept the myth that Supreme Court rulings make law. He accepted the Court's authority with regard to the sixteen plaintiffs who were before the Court, but flatly refused to accept that the Court's ruling was binding on Alabama. After all, he said, Alabama was not a defendant in the Obergefell case, was not in the courtroom, and was never given an opportunity to defend its state constitution.

Moore was famously removed from office by a kangaroo court, but never budged in his fidelity to both the United States Constitution and the constitution of the state of Alabama.

Bottom line: Judge Roy Moore lost his job for keeping his oath of office. Luther Strange kept his job by betraying it.

(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)

© Bryan Fischer

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

R.T. Neary
Open letter to U.S. Congressman Joseph P. Kennedy III

Madeline Crabb
We the Sheeple, the coup, and end-times prophecy

Matt C. Abbott
Brian Kindzia, R.I.P.

Dan Popp
Dr. Fauci unmasks the expert class

Stone Washington
Targeted by rogue FBI: The plot to entrap General Flynn

Matt C. Abbott
Jesus the ‘imperfect’?

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Mike Adams: The fault lies with those who make up the audience

Bryan Fischer
HCQ is the answer to COVID-19 — Don't let them lie to you

Judie Brown
The trouble with truth

Arlen Williams
Pray, petition, and prod Trump-Pence to reset the war on Covid-19, to actually win

Joan Swirsky
Joan Swirsky interviews Linda Goudsmit on her recently published opus, The Book of Humanitarian Hoaxes: Killing America

Linda Kimball
Orgy of violence, lawlessness, systemic lying pouring out of America’s broken foundations
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites