Peter Lemiska
Obamacare 2.0? Democrats are poised to compound a problem they created
By Peter Lemiska
November 12, 2018

It seems like only yesterday that Democrat lawmakers unilaterally passed the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. At the time, it was a widely unpopular law that was sold to the American people on false promises. It deprived countless individuals of their existing health insurance policies and their preferred doctors. Its oppressive regulations stifled economic growth, and it did nothing to reduce healthcare costs. Since Obamacare was passed, average insurance premiums have nearly doubled. Now Democrats have decided to take another bite of the apple. Leading up to last week's election, they again campaigned on the promise of affordable healthcare for everyone. In fact, Nancy Pelosi argues that Democrats won the House because "from the beginning" they focused on healthcare.

During President Trump's post-election news conference, one reporter asked a question about the Republican plan for healthcare. In view of last year's repeal of Obamacare's individual mandate, he wanted to know how pre-existing conditions can be covered without the revenue generated by the mandate.

That particular provision in Obamacare has always been the most controversial, the most onerous. It imposed heavy financial burdens on employers and on individuals who had no interest in purchasing health insurance. It had, for the first time in the history of our country, required every citizen to purchase something – health insurance. The cost of that insurance, or the alternative penalty fee, was ruled to be a lawful government tax only by the narrowest margin in the Supreme Court. But, as that reporter suggested, it was also an essential element of Obamacare. It was needed to fund the additional costs of insuring those with pre-existing conditions.

But "insuring" is not really the right word. "Insurance" is defined as "coverage by contract whereby one party undertakes to indemnify or guarantee another against loss by a specified contingency or peril." Like all capitalistic enterprises, health insurance companies sprang up to fill a consumer need, while at the same time putting millions to work and generating profit for stockholders. They offered consumers a free-market solution to skyrocketing medical costs by charging premiums and paying benefits to the insured parties when they became sick or injured. Profit could only be assured by setting those premiums according to actuarial formulas that consider variables like age, health, and lifestyle of the insured. By requiring private companies to cover health issues that already exist, Obamacare changed the very definition of insurance. Democrats had once again succeeded in redefining a fundamental concept long accepted by our society.

Regarding that question about pre-existing conditions, none of the reporters in Barack Obama's doting press corps ever asked this obvious question, "In a free-market system, how can any insurance company survive if the state requires it to insure against something that has already happened?"

As a country, we survived, even thrived, for nearly 200 years without a national healthcare program. Now, over a relatively short time span, nearly everyone has come to agree that all Americans must be provided with some form of healthcare.

But Democrats want much more than that. They're not really interested in the free market solutions or in health insurance. The election of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the re-election of Bernie Sanders and others on the far left suggests that this new, socialistic Democratic Party will work harder than ever to implement a single-payer plan, euphemistically called Medicare for all. Ultimately what they want is socialized medicine. Under such a plan, "pre-existing conditions" would have no meaning, and everyone in the country would receive the same Spartan-to-mediocre medical care that citizens in socialist countries endure. Those who contribute to the system would get the very same benefits as those who cannot or will not pay anything. The millions who regularly inhale, ingest, or inject various poisons into their bodies would get the same care afforded to health-conscious individuals. Those millions who are in this country illegally would also receive the same care.

And quality issues aside, the cost of such a plan would be staggering. Earlier this year, a proposed single-payer health care plan for North Carolina was scrapped when cost estimates came in at around $70 billion for that state alone, nearly twice the state's budget.

We would all like every man, woman, and child in America to be guaranteed the best quality healthcare in the world. That would truly be Utopia. But someone would have to pay the astronomical cost of such a program. The combined wealth of George Soros, Tom Steyer, the Clintons, the Hollywood elites, and all those wealthy liberals who want it – they can't afford Utopia. The top one percent can't pay for it. And we could not afford it even if we expanded our tax base to include the more than 70 million Americans and the vast numbers of illegal aliens who pay no income tax.

But through reasonable taxation funding government programs like CHIP, Medicaid, and Medicare, along with countless charitable organizations, America has long provided basic health care for nearly everyone citizen in the country. That system can always be improved. Eight years ago, Democrats reneged on their healthcare promises while penalizing millions of hard-working citizens who had been content with their long-held health insurance policies. Now, they seem poised to eliminate the entire insurance industry by socializing America's healthcare system.

© Peter Lemiska


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Peter Lemiska

Peter Lemiska served in the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Secret Service. Following his retirement from the Secret Service, he spent several years as a volunteer for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Like most of his contemporaries, he's always loved his country, and is deeply dismayed by this new and insidious anti-American sentiment threatening to destroy it. He's a life-long conservative, and his opinion pieces have been published in various print media and on numerous internet sites.


Receive future articles by Peter Lemiska: Click here

More by this author


Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Curtis Dahlgren
A funny thing happened on the way to Damascus

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 19: The grandeur of Christ’s return (Part 1)

Bonnie Chernin
Israel's abortion policy will imperil their security

Jerry Newcombe
An amazing story of redemption out of Pearl Harbor

R.T. Neary
Youthful medicine made in the USA—and it’s free of charge. Let’s manufacture a lot more

Cherie Zaslawsky
Israel in the crosshairs, Part Two

Pete Riehm
The world shares Israel’s problems

Peter Lemiska
The poisonous mix of imported hatred and home-grown ignorance

Michael Bresciani
Prophecy 2024: Major prophecies are closing fast

Selwyn Duke
For the West to live, immigration(ism) must die

Mark Shepard
Black Men for Trump – Makes a lot of sense

Cliff Kincaid
Will someone investigate the NSA?
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites