AI response:

Yes, requiring all children in public schools to study Catholic doctrine without parental consent would likely violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, which prohibits government from establishing or promoting a religion. Public schools cannot engage in religious instruction or endorse a specific religion. [1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4]

Elaboration:< /p>

• Establishment Clause: The First Amendment's Establishment Clause prevents the government from establishing a state religion or favoring one religion over another. This principle is fundamental to the separation of church and state. [1, 1, 3, 3, 5, 6]

• Religious Instruction vs. Teaching About Religion: Public schools can teach about religion, including its history, literature, and influence on culture, but they cannot provide religious instruction or promote a particular religious doctrine. [1, 1, 2, 2, 7]

• Parental Rights: Parents have the right to make decisions about their children's education, including religious education. Requiring religious instruction without parental consent would infringe on these rights. [8, 8, 9, 10]

• Court Cases: Supreme Court rulings, such as Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), have established that mandatory school prayer and Bible reading are unconstitutional. [11, 11, 12, 12]

• "Wall of Separation": The principle of separation of church and state, often referred to as the "wall of separation," is a guiding principle in the interpretation of the Establishment Clause. [13, 13]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/laws-preschool-grade-12-education/preschool-grade-12-policy-documents/guidance-on-constitutionally-protected-prayer-and-religious-expression-in-public-elementary-and-secondary-schools

[2] https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/education-policy/guidance-on-constitutionally-protected-prayer-and-religious-expression-in-public-elementary-and-secondary-schools

[3] https://www.edweek.org/leadership/religion-in-public-schools-explained/2024/08

[4] https://supreme.findlaw.com/supreme-court-insights/the-separation-of-church-and-state – everson-v – board-of-educatio.html

[5] https://www.edsurge.com/news/2025-03-25-a-supreme-court-case-could-change-how-we-think-about-and-pay-for-religious-schools

[6] https://www.news-shield.com/news/national/article_a85361dd-1490-5a51-a93c-f38a9425e36f.html

[7] https://www.pbs.org/moyers/faithandreason/small_pops/pop4cs.html

[8] https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/child-custody-religion-29887.html

[9] https://www.freedomforum.org/student-optouts-religious-freedom-case/

[10] https://teachdontpreach.ie/2023/05/having-religious-education-in-schools-is-a-constitutional-right-so-is-the-the-right-to-not-attend-it/

[11] https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/engel-v-vitale/facts-and-case-summary-engel-v-vitale

[12] https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/engel-v-vitale/similar-cases-engel-v-vitale

[13] https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/aid-to-parochial-schools/