Rev. Mark H. Creech
Why it matters Hillary Clinton erred in stating our national motto
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Rev. Mark H. Creech
August 6, 2016

Was it simply a faux pas? Was it ignorance? Or was it intentional? These were the questions running through my mind as I listened to Hillary Clinton's acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention (DNC).

After mentioning that she and other Democrats were meeting in Philadelphia, the nation's birthplace, Clinton briefly talked about the struggle that our nation's 13 colonies had in coalescing around the shaping of our Republic. "The revolution hung in the balance," she said, but they found "common purpose."

"Our Founders embraced the enduring truth that we are stronger together," she declared.

She then added, "America is once again at a moment of reckoning. Powerful forces are threatening to pull us apart. We have to decide whether we will work together so we all can rise together. Our country's motto is 'E Pluribus Unum: out of many we are one.' Will we stay true to that motto?"

Anyone with a fair and objective mind would have to admit she gave a good speech. It was largely about Americans uniting in common cause to overcome their many challenges. Nevertheless, in my opinion, the speech suffered a fatal flaw – one that undermined its entire premise. The fact is, "E Pluribus Unum" is not our National Motto. It never received congressional recognition as such. Instead our National Motto is "In God We Trust."

Officially approved by Congress in 1956, the nation's motto was drawn from the last stanza of the National Anthem, which reads:

"And this be our motto: 'In God is our trust'
And the Star Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave"


In a 2014 article titled, "In God We Trust v. E Pluribus Unum," Universal Coin and Bullion President, Mike Fuljenz, rightly says that while "E Pluribus Unum" is "meaningful in explaining the nation's origin," the phrase "In God We Trust" conveys something deeper. It "expresses American's deep, abiding faith that a higher power has guided the ship of state on its several century journey through human history's often stormy seas."

Clinton's error is no matter to be taken lightly because there has been a significant movement in recent years, mostly coming from the Progressive camp, that's trying to remove God from every part of public life. You might call it a new revolution – a revolt against America's Christian heritage – one based on anti-biblical values – one that indicts religious traditionalism as the oppressor of people's rights.

Presidential candidate Clinton often speaks affectionately about the positive influences of her Methodist background. Yet she is the same woman who said at the 2015 Women in the World Summit: "Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed."

These words sound more like someone prepared to lead an insurgency that will intimidate, litigate, and use the power of the state to marginalize the expression or influence of a conventional Christian worldview in the national life.

Such words also sound too close to the 2008 Democratic Party's nominee for President, Barrack Obama, who stated in a veiled promise his plan to bring "fundamental change" to America.

In 2010 as President of the United States, Obama also incorrectly identified "E Pluribus Unum" as the National Motto. When congressional members sought to clarify our real National Motto via a resolution, the President just dismissed the matter as a politically motivated distraction from the more important work of building the economy.

Unprecedented in the history of our country has been the Obama administration's acts of hostility toward Judeo-Christian values and the people who embrace them.

Are God-fearing and patriotic Americans to expect a continuation of the same under a Hillary Clinton Presidency?

It would at least seem that Clinton intends to pick up the baton and lead what Mary Eberstadt has termed, "the progressive-secular alliance."

In her new book, "It's Dangerous to Believe," Eberstadt describes the current cultural and political climate in this way:

"Cultural changes coupled with technological ones – chiefly, the amplification made possible by social media – have empowered an anti-religious minority and enabled it to pursue and punish the believers...They are the guardians of what has become a secularist substitute faith..."

Nowadays it is "[b]elligerent secularism" that is the real oppressor of the people's rights, says Eberstadt. Progressive activists shame and punish dissenters to this substitute faith by "multifaceted legal and other attacks." The irony of the situation she argues is "[t]oday's ongoing attempt to drive believers out of the national conversation is not only inegalitarian. It thoroughly contradicts progressivism's claim to value social and intellectual diversity."

How true!

America's unity, however, in the pursuit of liberty has traditionally found its inspiration in the shared conviction there is a Sovereign God to whom all men are accountable. We commonly have held that God gives everyone inalienable rights – rights the state, no man or woman, can justly deprive without due process. Our civil liberties, whether freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, the right to life, the right to a fair trial, the right to own property, etc., are a by-product of the Christian religion.

The late Dr. D. James Kennedy said it quite eloquently:

"Jesus Christ is the great emancipator in the history of the world...Christianity first set people free from the shackles of sin. Then, having experienced spiritual liberty, there was set in motion an inevitable quest for civil liberty as well. In the United States, where Christianity had its greatest impact, we have experienced civil liberties of a form and degree that had never been seen in any other country in the world."

Throughout time, whenever nations, tribes, and tongues, have banded in a mutual cause to build a society without God, it has inevitably ended in despotism, elitism, or both. No matter how high-sounding the rhetoric it never leads to the promise of greater freedom or equality, but instead factions, inequality, and bondage.

Yes, "In God We Trust" is truly our nation's motto. Our strength together has never been so much because of our faith or reliance in each other, but because of our faith in the Lord. The hope of "E Pluribus Unum" is empowered by "In God We Trust."

Why did Hillary Clinton state incorrectly our National Motto as "E Pluribus Unum" rather than "In God We Trust"? Did she just make a mistake? Or does she hope to plunge America further into the baptismal waters of its "secularist substitute faith"?

God save America.

© Rev. Mark H. Creech

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Rev. Mark H. Creech

Rev. Mark H. Creech is Executive Director of the Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc. He was a pastor for twenty years before taking this position, having served five different Southern Baptist churches in North Carolina and one Independent Baptist in upstate New York.

Rev. Creech is a prolific speaker and writer, and has served as a radio commentator for Christians In Action, a daily program featuring Rev. Creech's commentary on social issues from a Christian worldview.

In addition to RenewAmerica.com, his weekly editorials are featured on the Christian Action League website and Agape Press, a national Christian newswire.

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Rev. Mark H. Creech: Click here

More by this author

September 30, 2022
Revelation Chapter 4: The government of God


September 24, 2022
Revelation Chapter 4: The Rapture question


September 17, 2022
Revelation Chapter 3: The church that was neither cold nor hot, but lukewarm


September 11, 2022
Revelation Chapter 3: The church that was frail, but was fabulous


September 4, 2022
Disappointing: The National Association of Evangelicals urges evangelicals to help remedy climate change


September 2, 2022
Revelation Chapter 3: The church said to be ‘alive,’ but was ‘dead’


August 27, 2022
Revelation Chapter 2: The Church with many good works, but tolerated Jezebel


August 19, 2022
Revelation Chapter 2: The church that couldn’t be demolished from without, but was devastated from within


August 13, 2022
Revelation Chapter 2: The Church that was crushed and beaten, but had a fragrant testimony


August 6, 2022
Revelation Chapter 2: The church that stood for what is right, but needed love


More articles

 

Stephen Stone
A Prayer for America

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 4: The government of God

Jerry Newcombe
Is the church in America dying?

Joan Swirsky
The ONLY Issue in the 2022 Election is Voter Fraud

Cliff Kincaid
How to lose winnable elections

Pete Riehm
An American Gestapo?

Bonnie Chernin
Joe Biden: The great American unifier

Steve A. Stone
Contemplations of Tucker Carson and the Nordstream attack

Tom DeWeese
Think your vote doesn’t count?? Here’s why it does, and why it will be the most important one you’ve ever cast

Linda Kimball
The West’s greatest threat: doctrines of demons and the modern pagan and pantheist antithesis of the word of God

Matt C. Abbott
The post-‘Roe’ cultural backlash

Tom DeWeese
The ideal Communist American city

Michael Bresciani
Prophecy and the 2022 midterm elections
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites