Frances Kelly
March 29, 2012
Which came first: the SSM wedge or NOM?
By Frances Kelly

Answer: The wedge was already there.

Same-sex marriage activists are disturbed that the National Organization for Marriage reached out to enlist the help of minorities to defend pro-gender marriage.

A recently released memo by NOM states, "The strategic goal of this project is to drive a wedge between gays and blacks — two key Democratic constituencies." Gender-segregationist Evan Wolfson of Freedom to Marry asserts that NOM "will stop at nothing to push its agenda, pitting American against American, minority against minority, family members against family members."

The elephant in the room is the big fat wedge that existed long before NOM came into existence to defend marriage from activists who want to change it entirely by removing the gender-integrated component. Perhaps they believe that if they keep blaming NOM, no one will notice that it is same-sex marriage itself that pits American against American, creates a new minority of gender-segregated "married" couples, and divides families by deliberately preventing children from having a relationship with both a mother and a father.

Living on the wedge

Gender segregationists will be extremely disappointed when they finally realize how many wedges they created by advocating for separate marriage for genders. There's the wedge between evangelicals and the gay agenda. The wedge between Catholics and gender-segregated "marriage." The wedge between parents and homosexual propaganda in school. The wedge between businesses and their money when they are sued by monogender couples. The wedge between freedom of religion, and coercing people of faith to obey new gender-segregating marriage laws. The wedge between procreative biology, and the infertility of two "married" men.

Which came first, the pro-gender position or the wedge?

For millennia, people have honored gender integration in marriage. Don't blame NOM. Gay rights activists are the ones pushing segregation. The biggest wedge of all is separating men and women in marriage.

© Frances Kelly

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

 

Alan Keyes
Why de facto government (tyranny) is replacing the Constitution

Stephen Stone
Will Obama be impeached now that Republicans control both houses of Congress?

Tim Dunkin
Restoring the compact theory is vital to restoring the Constitution

Jerry Newcombe
Is work a curse or a gift?

Kevin Price
Charles Murray weighs in on 2016 elections

Michael Bresciani
Lots of marriage licenses but no marriage -- Kentucky clerk arrested

Bryan Fischer
Ben Carson and civil unions

Ellis Washington
Nazism American Style: The Nuremberg Race Laws (1935)

Curtis Dahlgren
Bracing for College Orientation Week, part II (another best of)

Rev. Austin Miles
FEATURE: Why Obama pushes LGBT agenda

Chuck Baldwin
The collapse of Christianity in America

A.J. Castellitto
Orthodoxy lost - an open letter to Jim Wallis and all the liberal lukewarm Christians

Laurie Roth
America didn't just explode on the scene like a "Darwinian disaster"

Matt C. Abbott
Planned Parenthood abortion mill being built by Catholic-owned business
  More columns

Cartoons


Michael Ramirez

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Bonnie Alba
Jamie Freeze Baird
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites