Carey Roberts
Men lead the conservative surge to retake Congress
By Carey Roberts
April 21, 2010

There's little doubt that November 2, 2010 will mark a historic realignment in American politics, as Democrats are predicted to endure painful losses in both the Senate and House. What is less appreciated is the fact that men, especially white men, will lead the way.

While it's true that women represent 53% of the national electorate, it's the 47% male vote that will make the difference on Election Day. That's because historically, the female vote tends to split between the two parties, casting men as electoral tie-breakers.

That's exactly what happened in January in Massachusetts. While 52% of white women voted for ultra-liberal Martha Coakley, 60% of men pulled the lever for candidate Scott Brown, handing the Republican upstart a stunning upset victory.

This same dynamic is now playing out across the nation, according to a recent Pew Research Center report, "Distrust, Discontent, Anger, and Partisan Rancor:"

The national poll of 2,500 Americans found seven out of 10 say government is wasteful and inefficient. A solid majority of citizens now believe the government "unfairly benefits some groups," "doesn't do enough to help average Americans," and "is too big and powerful." And nearly half — 47% — of Americans believe the government represents a threat to personal rights and freedoms.

But it's the male-female breakdowns where the numbers jump off the page and do somersaults and head-stands.

While 35% of women believe the government is pursuing the wrong priorities, 41% of men think the government has gone off the track, representing a six-point gender gap.

A minority of women (43%) believe the federal government threatens personal rights and freedoms, whereas a majority of men (52%) express this worry.

When asked whether government programs should be cut back, 52% of men, compared to 42% of women said "yes." (I suspect many of the gents used colorful language like, "h*ll yes," but the Pew report dutifully sanitizes that information.)

Not surprisingly, male anger over perceived government excess has translated into mushrooming support for the Tea Party movement. While 44% of female respondents indicated agreement with the Tea Party goals, 56% of males expressed such support, a landslide 12-point difference.

Pundit David Paul Kuhn believes these stark differences can be traced to underlying perceptions of what he calls the Mommy-Daddy Political Divide.

Maternal Democrats emphasize health care, the environment, and helping the poor. In contrast, the paternal Republicans view government primarily as a force for law and order. Hence, GOP priorities emphasize strengthening the military, illegal immigration, and moral breakdown.

(Ironically, Sarah Palin, courageous advocate for social conservativism, admits in her Going Rogue book to embracing nanny-state policies like Title IX, which imposes rigid gender quotas on college sports.)

As Kuhn notes, "Democrats saw an absent father who made a mess of the nation. The responsible mother was to take charge and make everything all right." That perception translated into sweeping Democratic victories in 2008.

But alas, Obama over-reached. While the $878 billion economic stimulus package was sold to the American public as a jobs bill, it was transmogrified behind the scenes into a social service entitlement bill. Then Obama became a stout defender of Wall Street and big business. "The president now personified the worst stereotypes of the mommy and daddy parties," Kuhn concludes.

Liberals read the polling numbers, too. Indeed, they tremble at the prospect of a mass exodus of the white male electorate, 41% of whom voted for Barack Obama in 2008.

But when push comes to shove, Democrats are firmly tied to the ideological apron-strings of radical feminism, as revealed by their unswerving positions on abortion, affirmative action, and the so-called "gender pay-gap."

So rather than accommodating the concerns of their male base, Democrats opted to caricature men, turning "White male" into a shame-inducing epithet.

Seeking to marginalize the rejuvenated political muscle of men, the Dems then accuse the Tea Party movement as being racist and sexist. As we know by now, liberal accusations of others are often a reflection of their own prejudices and biases.

So Tea Partiers — men and women, Black and White, young and old. I have some words of counsel: Stand tall, stand proud. If the lamestream media resorts to sneering stereotypes of angry White males, take them to task for their shameful and classless demagoguery.

And for good measure, ask them to explain how their family-destructive, nanny-state policies are helping women to become strong and independent.

On January 20, 2010, a remarkable political reversal took place in the least likely of venues, in ultra-liberal Massachusetts. Come November 2, history is destined to repeat itself.

© Carey Roberts


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Carey Roberts

Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and radical feminism... (more)

More by this author


Stephen Stone
HAPPY EASTER: A message to all who love our country and want to help save it

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
FLASHBACK to 2020: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
Press Conference on America's 'Reefer Madness'

Jerry Newcombe
Throwing Israel under the bus

Pete Riehm
Leftist accusations are latent confessions

Tom DeWeese
City of 'yes, I want to be a slave'

Curtis Dahlgren
The year the tree trimmer gave the commencement address at Yale

Randy Engel
A Documentary: Opus Dei and the Knights of Columbus – The anatomy of a takeover bid, Part IV

Linda Goudsmit
CHAPTER 18: American Marxism: The Biden Regime—Obama's Third Term

Marsha West
Is the “Christian Right” doing the right thing in God’s eyes?

Victor Sharpe
'He who is kind to the cruel ends by being cruel to the kind'

Tom DeWeese
Competing titles: Tennessee House falls victim to ‘Agenda 21’ Conspiracy Theory vs Tennessee bans Agenda 2030, other glo

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Pillars of society: Reclaiming traditional motherhood in modern times

Randy Engel
A Documentary: Opus Dei and the Knights of Columbus – The anatomy of a takeover bid, Part III
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites