Robert Meyer
Criticism of Warren invitation unwarranted
FacebookTwitterGoogle+
By Robert Meyer
January 20, 2009

To the consternation and disappointment of many ardent Obama supporters, Rick Warren, the famous mega-church evangelical author, was asked to officiate at the presidential inauguration of President Barack Obama.

Rick Warren has recently been maligned for, among other things, supporting the California voting initiative that would maintain a legal distinction between same-sex civil unions and traditional marriage.

That being said, no orthodox Christian recognizes Warren as the heir to Jerry Falwell's ideological legacy. Warren, in fact, has more in common with the socially liberal evangelical, Tony Campolo, than Falwell, or any other icon of the right-wing evangelical movement. While Warren may be orthodox on the issue of traditional marriage, it is not an ideological hill he is willing to die upon as he himself has hinted at in public statements.

That is why the disapproval of Obama for conscripting Warren's service is so puzzling and, in a sense, alarming. Liberal activists who reflexively condemn Warren as divisive, never make mention of the fact that another clergyman officiating the inaugural ceremonies is the practicing gay Episcopal Bishop, Gene Robinson. Ironically, Robinson's pursuit of actualizing his own proclivities was a major catalyst in dividing an entire Christian denomination. How then, is one truly any more divisive than the other?

It is hard to rationally argue that Obama is failing to be "inclusive," simply because he has chosen a clergyman who is orthodox in at least some areas. Even the benign act of throwing token table scraps to conservative Christians, is viewed as a major betrayal of principle for many liberal activists. A complete departure from the historical inaugural tradition of orthodox Christian observances fails to appease those who speak most demonstratively about tolerance and inclusiveness.

This appears to be overreaching on the part of progressive ideologues. Rather than embracing the evolutionary approach, by allowing for gradual assimilation of changes in cultural values and perceptions, these advocates take the revolutionary approach that demands immediate accommodation.

The scary part of this scenario is the rhetorical flourish by which some draw sweeping, inaccurate conclusions. One recent letter to the editor that I read, suggested that Warren's position has historical affinity and connection with those who opposed the movements for racial equality and womens' suffrage. That sort of insinuation is neither an isolated or unique perspective as viewpoints go, but they are knee-jerk red herrings. Not only does Warren have no sympathy for the aforementioned issues but, there is no basis for assuming they are even related issues on a continuum of bigotry, unless one constructs an argument founded on emotional innuendo and self-serving sophistry.

In the past, there has been little complaint about lack of inclusiveness when there has been a notable absence of Jewish, Islamic or other non-Christian clergy officiating at presidential inaugurations. This is largely because the president has the right to choose his religious representatives, which generally reflect his religious persuasions. It seems absurd to argue that the presence of a moderate Christian voice has suddenly become a threat to unity.

I must conclude that if any group is being nudged out of "inclusiveness" in this inauguration, it is those who faithfully adhere to traditional Christianity. The practice of "tolerance" tends to be a convenient one-way street for those who are most vocal in their celebration of it.

© Robert Meyer

 

The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Robert Meyer

Robert Meyer is a hardy soul who hails from the Cheesehead country of the upper midwest... (more)

Subscribe

Receive future articles by Robert Meyer: Click here

More by this author

 

Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
The best Christmas bargain: A free Ukraine

Steve A. Stone
The man from The Perfect Place

Curtis Dahlgren
Orwell and Hubbard; a Brit and an American writer

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 6: The deceptive rider on the white horse

Cliff Kincaid
Saving America by saving Ukraine

Jerry Newcombe
Cancelling the “most wonderful time of the year?”

Judi Caler
Bluffing their way to an Article V Convention

Paul Cameron
The Marriage Equality Act in light of gay sex rings and molestations in group homes

Michael Bresciani
Why Libs, Dems, LGBT and Trans activists can’t identify the source of their own deep confusion

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Rev. Mark Creech issues statement on Senate passage of ‘Respect for Marriage Act’

Tom DeWeese
What we can learn from a red tide

Selwyn Duke
The new voting system that gave Dems a GOP House seat is dangerous. Here’s why.
  More columns

Cartoons


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds

News:
Columns:

Columnists

Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites