Mark Shepard
Converting Tea-Party energy into sustained results
By Mark Shepard
January 18, 2010

Recent polls show the Tea Partiers now outnumber registered Republicans and Democrats. That is great news because the people connected to tea parties are energized, motivated by ideas and values, and fed up with party-power politics. But it remains to be seen what will come of all this exceptional citizen energy.

With many Tea Partiers repulsed at the thought of working within an existing political party, some are itching to start a new party. Some advocate throwing out all the incumbents, while others are focusing on throwing out the statist, those who advocate more and more government (or state) control over our lives.

However, getting rid of the statists is only the start, because without a sound basis and an agenda to turn back the statist policies, which have been enacted, we will soon find the statists in power again with their agenda moving forward. We have seen this both in Vermont and nationally.

While the Vermont 2000 elections flipped the House control from Democrat to Republican, and Republicans made substantial gains in the Senate, the change yielded little if anything. Nationally, the 1994 Congress started turning back the statists' policies, but they lost the PR battle because not enough of the American people understood the problems with big government or the benefits of limited government. Before long Republicans were advocating for more and more government.

Clearly, simply switching back to Republican control is not a solution. Nor is the solution just replacing the statists legislators for another group of legislators under any label. The label is neither the problem nor the solution.

The problem is the ideology. Unless we elect a majority of people who understand our problems from a foundational perspective and who can and will articulate ideas from a foundation that is as deep or deeper than that of the statists, any victory in 2010 will be short lived, whether Republican, Libertarian, or Tea Party. It will only sap up and waste this terrific energy.

Real victory requires that we unite under ideas that have a sound foundation, which can and does support liberty. A foundation for individual liberty requires that each person be valued higher than some idealistic or inventive idea of community or culture. I expressed thoughts on such a basis in a recent commentary:

One of the main points I tried to weave into that commentary was that culture is derived from people and not people from culture. Ideas and concepts need to be willingly accepted as valid for them to have a positive effect on the culture. Thus, while I presented what I believe to be the most secure foundation for liberty, I do not consider those ideas as something that can be instituted by a top down approach. Top down breeds unrest and revolution. Bottom up fosters personal fulfillment and a harmonious culture.

What we have in Montpelier, Vermont and Washington is very much top down and that is what is fueling the tea party and other expressions of great dissatisfaction. Turning things around demands we put some of our energy into searching out a sound basis to support liberty and then to build our lives on that basis. Such personal investment of energy will multiply a hundred-fold and is necessary to bring about a lasting and beneficial revolution.

Surely we need to remove the statists, but for real and lasting gains we must also expose the fraud and holes in their ideology and that requires a better set of ideas, based upon a foundation that does not have holes so it can win in the public square. Not until this point are we likely to see people in large numbers shift away from their dependence on government, which I believe is the real goal of most tea party folks.

© Mark Shepard


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Mark Shepard

Mark Shepard served two terms in the Vermont Senate (2003-2006) and ran for Congress in the 2006 Republican Primary. (Click here for more.)

For a number of reasons, not the least of which is its small size, Vermont was targeted as a key beachhead by those desiring to move America away from its liberty-based birth, where the laws of nature and nature's God were supreme, and toward socialism, where the state (man's wisdom) is supreme. It was in that environment that Mark ran and served in elected politics... (more)


Receive future articles by Mark Shepard: Click here

More by this author


Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Pete Riehm
Will social media ever allow free speech?

Randy Engel
The life and times of Archbishop John R. Quinn & friends: A study of the West Coast homosexual network, Part I

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 13: The rise of the false prophet

Curtis Dahlgren
'Hammer and Tickle' by Ben Lewis, a book review

Paul Cameron
History’s biggest con? The trans scam

Cliff Kincaid
Constitutional principles and the debt deal

Michael Bresciani
Why is America running away from the protection of the living God?

Cliff Kincaid
Why the Marxists always win

Bruce Deitrick Price
Now here's my plan: Let's fix education

Matt C. Abbott
MLB’s Dodgers, anti-Catholic bigotry and the SPI

Jerry Newcombe
The Founders and religious liberty

Anita Crane
Let ‘Nefarious’ scare the Hell out of you
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites