Louie Verrecchio
Revolting against the king
By Louie Verrecchio
As I write, on this the eve of the Fourth of July, which here in the United States is known and celebrated as Independence Day, freedom and revolution are well on my mind.
In an attempt to justify their campaign to anoint "conscience" as king under the banner of religious freedom, the bishops of the United States have turned to a rather unlikely source for support; the would-be deposed and rightful Occupant of the throne.
Like every other revolution against a sitting Sovereign, this uprising also requires the enlistment and arming of rebels, to which end the USSCB has created a veritable online recruiting station and weapons depot, a webpage dedicated to "Conscience Protection."
Among the artillery being made available there is a "one-pager" entitled, "Christ the King," that presumably purports to demonstrate "continuity" between the manifesto of the movement – either Dignitatis Humanae of Vatican Council II or the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (pick whichever one you happen to prefer; they're essentially the same), and the immutable doctrine set forth in the Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas.
Under the audacious subtitle, "THAT HE WOULD REIGN IN OUR HEARTS," (all caps in the original), the document begins:
To "Cotton Candy Catholics" and "Neo-Con Weigel Wannabes" who persist in a state of denial concerning the crisis at hand, this fallacious blather likely seems rather harmless; even laudable.
Those grounded in the unchangeable truths of the Faith, on the other hand, cannot help but be thoroughly incensed by the sheer hubris of those who would mislead the unwitting into believing that Pope Pius XI intended nothing more in Quas Primas than to promote a generic spiritual concept, fully embraceable by heretics and Catholics alike, wherein Christ the King may "reign in our hearts."
Here's the cold, hard, objective truth, like it or not: The doctrine expressed in Quas Primas utterly eviscerates the false, humanistic precepts that form the very foundation of the present revolt. PERIOD.
You see, far from the deliberately incomplete caricature being offered in the Conference's rebellious "one-sheet," Pope Pius XI made it exceedingly clear in Quas Primas that the reign of Jesus Christ is not simply a spiritual one; rather, Our Lord has dominion over the entire created order:
So what is a Catholic to do? Pope Pius XI tells us:
© Louie Verrecchio
July 4, 2013
As I write, on this the eve of the Fourth of July, which here in the United States is known and celebrated as Independence Day, freedom and revolution are well on my mind.
In an attempt to justify their campaign to anoint "conscience" as king under the banner of religious freedom, the bishops of the United States have turned to a rather unlikely source for support; the would-be deposed and rightful Occupant of the throne.
Like every other revolution against a sitting Sovereign, this uprising also requires the enlistment and arming of rebels, to which end the USSCB has created a veritable online recruiting station and weapons depot, a webpage dedicated to "Conscience Protection."
Among the artillery being made available there is a "one-pager" entitled, "Christ the King," that presumably purports to demonstrate "continuity" between the manifesto of the movement – either Dignitatis Humanae of Vatican Council II or the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (pick whichever one you happen to prefer; they're essentially the same), and the immutable doctrine set forth in the Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, Quas Primas.
Under the audacious subtitle, "THAT HE WOULD REIGN IN OUR HEARTS," (all caps in the original), the document begins:
-
In 1925, Pope Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King in his encyclical letter Quas Primas in response to growing nationalism and secularism around the world. He had the foresight to realize that secularism could soon wage awful wars against the Church.
During the early twentieth century, in Mexico, Russia, and in many parts of Europe, atheistic regimes threatened not just the Catholic Church and its faithful but civilization itself. Pope Pius XI's encyclical gave Catholics hope and – while governments of men around them crumbled – the assurance that Christ the King shall reign forever. Pope Pius XI said that Christ "reign[s] 'in the hearts of men,' both by reason of the keenness of his intellect and the extent of his knowledge, and also because he is very truth, and it is from him that truth must be obediently received by all mankind."
To "Cotton Candy Catholics" and "Neo-Con Weigel Wannabes" who persist in a state of denial concerning the crisis at hand, this fallacious blather likely seems rather harmless; even laudable.
Those grounded in the unchangeable truths of the Faith, on the other hand, cannot help but be thoroughly incensed by the sheer hubris of those who would mislead the unwitting into believing that Pope Pius XI intended nothing more in Quas Primas than to promote a generic spiritual concept, fully embraceable by heretics and Catholics alike, wherein Christ the King may "reign in our hearts."
Here's the cold, hard, objective truth, like it or not: The doctrine expressed in Quas Primas utterly eviscerates the false, humanistic precepts that form the very foundation of the present revolt. PERIOD.
You see, far from the deliberately incomplete caricature being offered in the Conference's rebellious "one-sheet," Pope Pius XI made it exceedingly clear in Quas Primas that the reign of Jesus Christ is not simply a spiritual one; rather, Our Lord has dominion over the entire created order:
-
If we ponder this matter more deeply, we cannot but see that the title and the power of King belongs to Christ as man in the strict and proper sense too. For it is only as man that he may be said to have received from the Father "power and glory and a kingdom," since the Word of God, as consubstantial with the Father, has all things in common with him, and therefore has necessarily supreme and absolute dominion over all things created ... It would be a grave error to say that Christ has no authority whatever in civil affairs, since, by virtue of the absolute empire over all creatures committed to Him by the Father, all things are in His power. (QP 7, 17)
-
His empire includes not only Catholic nations, not only baptized persons who, though of right belonging to the Church, have been led astray by error, or have been cut off from her by schism, but also all those who are outside the Christian faith; so that truly the whole of mankind is subject to the power of Jesus Christ. (QP 18)
-
When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony ... Nations will be reminded by the annual celebration of this feast that not only private individuals but also rulers and princes are bound to give public honor and obedience to Christ. It will call to their minds the thought of the last judgment, wherein Christ, who has been cast out of public life, despised, neglected and ignored, will most severely avenge these insults; for his kingly dignity demands that the State should take account of the commandments of God and of Christian principles, both in making laws and in administering justice, and also in providing for the young a sound moral education. (QP 19, 32)
-
Make it your duty and your task, Venerable Brethren, to see that sermons are preached to the people in every parish to teach them the meaning and the importance of this feast, that they may so order their lives as to be worthy of faithful and obedient subjects of the Divine King. (QS 29)
So what is a Catholic to do? Pope Pius XI tells us:
-
While nations insult the beloved name of our Redeemer by suppressing all mention of it in their conferences and parliaments, we must all the more loudly proclaim His kingly dignity and power, all the more universally affirm His rights. (QP 25)
© Louie Verrecchio
The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)