Robert Meyer
Why Congress is dysfunctional
By Robert Meyer
April 22, 2015

We have heard complaints about the "do nothing congress" for the past several presidential administrations. Indeed, we frequently see that congressional approval numbers flirt with historically low positive rates. This has occurred whether the majority of congress has belonged to democrats or republicans.

The American people have often decried the inability of congress to stop the bickering and work together to get things done. At the same time, we hear of politicians campaigning on the platitude that they will be willing to reach across the aisle. Still little improvement seems to come out each new session of congress.

So where does the dissonance come from and, how might it be corrected? We must first understand that the constitutional Convention created two houses of congress, in part, to make it difficult, but not impossible to quickly pass legislation.

The problem as I see it, is that we have unwavering loyalty to political party at the expense of all other priorities. I am not speaking so much about commitment to political ideology, or philosophical worldview, as I am of an administrative apparatus of coercion.

Our first president, George Washington, warned us of this in his Farewell Address. Washington's sentiments epitomized the perspective of the Founders in general.

"Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty."

So while party loyalty forms out of the lesser angels of the human condition, it was viewed as a destructive force by the Founders. What is missing today is zeal toward the specific branches of government, which assures a robust operation of separation of powers.

Congress today, seems to have devolved into the weakest branch of government, because members have not vigorously exercised their checks over the judicial and executive branches. Courts have been allowed to legislate from the bench through activism that ignores the jurisprudence of original intent. They have permitted judges to act as philosopher-kings. Likewise, congress has permitted itself to be outflanked by increasing numbers of executive orders which circumvent it's constitutional role.

Again, Washington comments on this state of affairs.

"It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositaries, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed..."

In the Constitution, congress has a remedy to limit the jurisdiction of courts. "In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make." Article III, Section 2, Clause 2

Congress has the ability to impeach judges as well, but when is the last time you heard of that happening?

Congress has checks on presidential authority as well. The chief problem is that congress can not unite as a body, zealous of their particular powers and duties, but fragments itself according to party affiliation. If a judge legislates from the bench to accomplish what has failed legislatively, the portion of congress that has affinity with the judge's decision will approve of the actions, rather than dissent with the usurpation. It is likewise with overreach by the executive branch.

As long as this practice continues, people will feel betrayed by their representatives and disapproval will be high.

© Robert Meyer


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Robert Meyer

Robert Meyer is a hardy soul who hails from the Cheesehead country of the upper midwest... (more)


Receive future articles by Robert Meyer: Click here

More by this author


Stephen Stone
'The fervent prayer of the righteous'

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Bruce Deitrick Price
Are you concerned about the quality of our public schools?

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 2: The church that stood for what is right, but needed love

Michael Bresciani
Taiwan, Pelosi’s attention-getting distraction: A political stunt

Jerry Newcombe
Falsely teaching our children that America is evil

Selwyn Duke
When Joe caved to Joe: The real Manchin con

Curtis Dahlgren
January 6 "justice" vs. BLM-ANTIFA violence: a look back

Randy Engel
Bishop James T. McHugh – The forgotten man in the McCarrick equation

Pete Riehm
Cow tipping and kowtowing

Stone Washington
Rescuing the right to life: The aftermath of abortion rights in America

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 1: ‘The one who is, who was, and who is coming’

Jerry Newcombe
Madison on the chopping block?

Kari Lee Fournier
Almighty God versus Satan: The sting of the century!
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons

RSS feeds



Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites