Kevin Price
Charles Murray weighs in on 2016 elections
By Kevin Price
September 4, 2015

Dr. Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute is one of the most popular of public intellectuals among libertarians today. Furthermore, he is one of the more popular guests I have on my program. He never disappoints as he brings unique perspectives to every public policy and even political discussion. Recently on my radio show, we talked about the 2016 elections. He warned me quickly "I'm not known for my insight on political campaigns," however, he wasn't at all shy in providing his thoughts. His views had to be surprising to anyone who shares his libertarian bent.

Although Charles Murray is a self-described libertarian, he is more of a classical liberal that believes government should do as little as possible and that its political subdivisions that weaken it actually make it more effective in how it serves the people. He has an entrepreneurial view of government, in which it should constantly be moved towards decentralization and a strong commitment to what simply works.

I was shocked by whom he referred to on how to choose a presidential candidate. He quoted the conservative intellectual, William F. Buckley, who essentially argued that those with conservative values should choose the candidate who best reflects those values, yet also has a chance to win. The general idea being that conservatives will have a bigger say in that selection process if they quickly get behind a winning candidate who has views close enough to their own, even if not the best representation of that philosophy. Coming from Buckley, this does not surprise me. Buckley was an intellectual giant, but his conservatism pales against the bold views expected today.

Murray, on the other hand, is still very much a libertarian. So when he said that his choices were either Marco Rubio or Scott Walker, I was quite surprised.

Senator Rubio (R-FL) has been in government office since he was 28 years old. Essentially his entire adult life. He is the epitome of a career politician. Furthermore, he has been frequently described as a "big government conservative." This expression has always seemed like an oxymoron to me, but it has grown on me over time. Essentially it means individuals who talk a great deal about the horrors of big and expensive government, but they usher it in anyway. It may not be in typical liberal programs, but they are government programs nevertheless. It is hard to not be a fan of government and serve as Speaker of any legislative body, which he did in the state of Florida. The Speaker of any house is about compromises and deals being made, and that is a pretty solid reflection of his career in that state.

Governor Walker (R-WI) on the other hand, has a solid track record as a champion of limited government, but he has seemed to go to lengths to distance himself from libertarians, even implying he was not that group's natural choice. Yet I know many libertarians, like Murray, that seem to be very attracted to him in spite of the push back. Libertarians are attracted to candidates who not only say they will fight big, institutional, power, but actually do it. Walker's willingness to tackle the teacher salaries and pensions in his home state made him a national conservative darling and certainly one that would make libertarians look at twice.

What is most surprising to me was the total lack of mentioning of Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) until after I prompted that conversation. He did say that, on paper, he related to Paul more than any other candidate. He just completely doubted the Senator's ability to catch on. Paul certainly has struggled, but so has every candidate other than Donald Trump. I think Trump is a phenomenon beyond every other candidates' control and something never seen in modern political history. The obvious assault on civil liberties (with concerns about the NSA on the left and gun control on the right), I know very few libertarians who don't agree that the Bill of Rights is certainly one of the most important issues of our time and Paul is the only one who consistently discusses them.

On Trump, Murray said that the surge of the billionaire was a reflection of the "dysfunction" in the electorate. The fact Trump has never held office, "cannot be bought" because he is rich, and has incredible candor, many Americans ignore the obvious which is a history of taking liberal and extreme positions on a number of issue. Trump supported a single payer system for Obamacare (which is even more extreme than what we have) and his proposed trade policies would create a situation like we had with the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which contributed significantly to the Great Depression.

In Murray's defense, he's a policy guy and not a political pundit. He said, he brought nothing more to the conversation than most radio listeners. But he is also highly intelligent and intuitive. It will be interesting to see how his choices will perform in this most unusual election cycle.

© Kevin Price


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.
(See RenewAmerica's publishing standards.)

Click to enlarge

Kevin Price

Kevin Price is Publisher and Editor in Chief of

His background is eclectic and includes years of experience in both business and public policy, as well as two decades of experience in broadcast journalism. He was an aide to U.S. Senator Gordon Humphrey (R-NH) and later went on to work in policy areas with some of the nation's leading think tanks including the National Center for Public Policy Research and was part of the Heritage Foundation's Annual Guide to Public Policy Experts... (more)


Receive future articles by Kevin Price: Click here

More by this author


Stephen Stone
The most egregious lies Evan McMullin and the media have told about Sen. Mike Lee

Siena Hoefling
Protect the Children: Update with VIDEO

Stephen Stone
Flashback: Dems' fake claim that Trump and Utah congressional hopeful Burgess Owens want 'renewed nuclear testing' blows up when examined

Cliff Kincaid
The origins of queer communism

Curtis Dahlgren
Modern "education:" Blend in; don't stand out, whatever you do

Matt C. Abbott
The case of the Rev. Christopher Senk

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 13: The Beast, persecution, and providence

Louie Verrecchio
Dodgers Pride Night: Catholics strike out looking

Jerry Newcombe
Is America still worth fighting for?

Michael Bresciani
Some sound biblical advice for candidate Donald Trump

Marsha West
Are you praying to the only true God?

Tom DeWeese
Unesco and Red Flag Laws

Cliff Kincaid
Ukraine deserves the right to live

Pete Riehm
Corruption confirmed and still no consequences

Rev. Mark H. Creech
Revelation Chapter 13: The activities of the Beast
  More columns


Click for full cartoon
More cartoons


Matt C. Abbott
Chris Adamo
Russ J. Alan
Bonnie Alba
Chuck Baldwin
Kevin J. Banet
J. Matt Barber
Fr. Tom Bartolomeo
. . .
[See more]

Sister sites